User talk:Matthew Stannard

 Leave a Message 

 It is now on Monday, July 29, 2024 Wikitime 

Useful stuff
/Archive 1

Some tags:
 * List of shortcuts
 * About templates:.
 * List of shortcuts
 * About templates:.

Some or all of the following is based off User:Angela/useful stuff.
 * Recent changes (anonymous users)
 * Goings-on
 * Recent changes (Wikipedia: namespace)
 * Angela's Useful Stuff (remember to change out names! =b)
 * Post a copyvio notice
 * user:Matthew Stannard/Scratch
 * user:Matthew Stannard/Research
 * user:Matthew Stannard/Projects
 * user:Matthew Stannard/list of family separation research articles

do you have the diffs for this?
"The difficulty here is that the subscribers to Prem Rawat's services hold that any site that contains material that they don't like means that any link to anywhere on that site should be removed from wikipedia, regardless of whether a particular link is to something useful and informative" Hohohahaha (talk) 02:18, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey there.

Thanks for all the diffs.... and I am not clear, are you asking me to insert them in the evidence section for you? Hohohahaha (talk) 14:38, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of People's jury
A tag has been placed on People's jury, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mr. P. S. Phillips (talk) 02:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I've removed the tag - looks like it may have been placed accidentally or something, as the article is clearly not nonsense. --Snigbrook ( talk ) 03:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of People's jury
I have nominated People's jury, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/People's jury. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mr. P. S. Phillips (talk) 04:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Bum-Jae You
A tag has been placed on Bum-Jae You requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Jiuguang Wang (talk) 20:28, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ElgooG


The article ElgooG has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Anonymous Dissident  Talk 13:35, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Since the article has already survived AfD, where its notability was asserted, I've opted to rescind my PROD nomination. I'll work on introducing information about why the website is notable. — Anonymous Dissident  Talk 13:37, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Matthew Stannard! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:56, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Guido Daniele -
 * 2) Terence Frisby -

File source problem with File:IMG 3753a.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:IMG 3753a.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:42, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:42, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

File:RDawkins saint.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RDawkins saint.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Kelly hi! 04:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Calmer  Waters  11:28, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ElgooG


The article ElgooG has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No assertion of notability, violates WP:N

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Perseus, Son of Zeus ✉ sign here   18:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Playlist for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Playlist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Playlist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 03:24, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Weinberg's law of twins


The article Weinberg's law of twins has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Anecdote with no secondayr sources to establish notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 17:51, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fatherhood Institute


A tag has been placed on Fatherhood Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kevin (kgorman-ucb) (talk) 19:51, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

ECig Battery Wear
Image shows scuffing of the battery cover that results in it short-circuiting with the device's battery container and causing unintended operation of the heater coil. Matt Stan (talk) 21:08, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Ecig battery wear.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Ecig battery wear.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 22:30, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Matt O'Connor


A tag has been placed on Matt O'Connor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mdann52 (talk) 13:53, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Matthew Stannard with daughter Chloe.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Matthew Stannard with daughter Chloe.jpg

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:46, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

WP:TPNO
Do not include personal details as you have now 4 times. Also, your message is not relevant to the article's encyclopaedic content. Thanks. Leaky Caldron  10:58, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You've included your name and address. That's personal information. No, it is not important to include details about your MPs answer machine message. The details will be oversighted shortly. Do not re-add them. Leaky  Caldron  11:24, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Matthew Stannard/datasheets


A tag has been placed on User:Matthew Stannard/datasheets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cahk (talk) 22:38, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Please claim your upload(s): File:Matthew_Stannard_with_daughter_Chloe.jpg
Hi, This image was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices, Thank you.

However, as part of ongoing efforts to ensure all media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed it would be appreciated if you were able to confirm, that it was your own work, by marking it as own, amending the information added by a third party, and by changing the license to an appropriate "self" variant. This will assist those reviewing the many many "free" images on commons that have not yet been transfered to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:30, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Kevin McCabe (economist) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin McCabe (economist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kevin McCabe (economist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LK (talk) 03:54, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Matthew Stannard with daughter Chloe.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Matthew Stannard with daughter Chloe.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Re: Religion

 * I wrote to Richard Dawkins and New Scientist to remind them that it was Martin Luther King who said, "Understand the concept of love." and how would you get people to do that without the teachings of Christianity or the other great religions? I didn't get a reply.

Most people "understand love" from their everyday experiences and from popular culture. If this is referring to the idea that people would be better off if we all loved each other, that's not unique to religion; it's also a teaching of atheistic secular humanism and secular ethics. It's perfectly defensible based on reason and self-interest, or appeal to people's natural empathy. -- Beland (talk) 16:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Ann Baskett
Dear Matthew, Could I perhaps ask you something about Ann Baskett, whom I take is a relative? I have been examining various versions of Pride and Prejudice from as early as 1938. They're almost all lost, but I've always been able to find screenplays... Except for the BBC's 1952 version! (Even though the BBC also made one in 1938, that is perfectly preserved -- as a script.) Mrs. Baskett didn't by any chance keep a copy...? I've tried both the BBC and the last known address of the writer, but no luck. Spiny Norman (talk) 20:04, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elephant Pepper Development Trust


The article Elephant Pepper Development Trust has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No significant coverage to meet WP:ORG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)