User talk:Matthewcressey

January 2014
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kenneth Omeruo, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:46, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qed237. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Chelsea F.C. without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! QED 237  (talk)  12:08, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to 2013–14 Everton F.C. season, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. QED 237  (talk)  16:05, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hull City A.F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:39, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mauro Zárate. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:04, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chelsea F.C.. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:22, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chelsea F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:27, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Chelsea F.C.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:40, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chelsea F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. LRD NO (talk) 23:20, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Blocked for 60 hours, with final warning before being indefinitely blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Kralizec! (talk) 01:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Lewis Baker (footballer). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:50, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Petr Čech. Do not update statistics without updating the "last updated" field as this makes it difficult to keep track. C679 20:37, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2014–15 Chelsea F.C. season. ''Same as above, TIMESTAMP and also in a stats table for club update entire table and not just the parts/players you like. '' QED237&#160;(talk) 00:46, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Infobox dates
Hi, when updating club stats in the infobox you should update the pcupdate or club-update parameter by adding five tildes, which generates the specific time the update was made. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 20:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Please keep this in mind. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chelsea F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. More unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:46, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 Months for Repeated addition of unreferenced data. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ron h jones (Talk) 22:39, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ruben Loftus-Cheek, you may be blocked from editing. See  Qed237&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 19:36, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lewis Baker (footballer). <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 19:37, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 18 October
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Bruno Andrade (Portuguese footballer) page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=686322365 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F686322365%7CBruno Andrade (Portuguese footballer)%5D%5D Ask for help])

Proposed deletion of Harry Cardwell


The article Harry Cardwell has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 00:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Harry Cardwell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harry Cardwell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Harry Cardwell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 00:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cameron Norman


The article Cameron Norman has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 00:44, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Cameron Norman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cameron Norman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cameron Norman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. <i style="font-family:Sans-serif"><b style="color:blue">Qed</b><b style="color:red">237</b>&#160;<b style="color:green">(talk)</b></i> 22:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)