User talk:Matthias3110

I'm about to add additional pieces of information to the article, based on the items you mentioned in your list. Thanks that you will add the material om his education and that you will take care for the wording. Sorry, I cannot understand why you consider the material I added as widely inappropriate. I listed some of the most important scientific prizes such as the Linus Pauling prize in nutrition; furthermore, for most of the prizes I added which organization awarded these. These prizes simply stress the importance of his contributions to the field of vitamin D research. This article is about to be improved and you are welcome to help doing that. I will add which books he wrote, maybe you can help with adding the full bibliographic format for the case I don't do it 100% correctly. That would be very helpful. by Matthias3110

Status and Advice
Please add only the following additional information:


 * 1) A list of his books, in full formal bibliographic format, with references to the WorldCat record for the item.
 * 2) .His four or five most highly cited papers, of which he is the principal author, giving the citation figures, sourced to Science citation index. Just the few most cited.
 * 3) .Additionally, if you have a photograph for which you have a free license according to the requirements, and can say so appropriately on the upload page, you can add that. The caption should be just his name.
 * 4) .For each prize, write out the name of the organization giving it, and link to our article on them. If we do not have an article on them, the prize is probably not important, and should be removed. In each case, make certain that the prize you list is the highest level national honor awarded by the society. If not, remove it.
 * 5) I will add the material on his education in the proper form, Don't add it yourself.
 * 6) I will then take care of the wording.
 * 7) Please don't add anything else at all. The wildly inappropriate material you previously added came very near getting the article deleted.  DGG ( talk ) 16:08, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Michael F. Holick. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 17:25, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Vit D
Its level is not routinely measured. And a 1972 ref would not support current practice. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:11, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello DocJames, the 25OH-Vitamin D level is not meassured routinely in all patients, but it's routinely meassured TO DETERMINE A PATIENT'S VITAMIN D STATUS; but you're right, the references were not correct, I put the 1972 reference directly behind the information that he identified 25-OH-Vitamin D and added another citation which supports the statement, that 25-OH-Vitamin D is routinely meassured to asses the vitamin d status. Thanks for that hint. --Matthias3110 (talk) 19:06, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

As "routinely" sounded ambigous in that context, I used different words to describe, that 25-OH-vitamin D is the vitamin d metabolite that is meassured to assess the nutritional status. --Matthias3110 (talk) 22:50, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure you can mention him for both but write it so that his name is written only once. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 23:37, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Michael F. Holick - Photo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Michael F. Holick - Photo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
You may also find it useful to read my image copyright information page. ww2censor (talk) 20:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Michael F. Holick - Photo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Michael F. Holick - Photo.jpg, which you've sourced to apparently the subject, see note. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 03:17, 11 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I've contacted Dr. Holick and sent him the consent form and told him which adress he should send the form to. He will take care of consenting with the license in the next days. Thanks --Matthias3110 (talk) 13:38, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I've added the permission template. I also added a mostly blank information template. Would you be so kind as to fill in at least the mandatory fields - description and author?-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  18:44, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael F. Holick concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael F. Holick, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)