User talk:Matthiesen

Welcome!

Hello, Matthiesen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jeffrey M. Karp, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ... disco spinster   talk  04:32, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeffrey M. Karp


A tag has been placed on Jeffrey M. Karp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ... disco spinster   talk  04:32, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Reply
The Harvard biography does not explicitly assert that its content is public domain, so the assumption is always that such a site is claiming copyright. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by the subject of the article, unless they state clearly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright isn't sufficient.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at the talk page with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article talk page.
 * Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at the article talk page with a link to the web page details.
 * Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a tag on the article page and leave a note at the article talk page saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

Your article also did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts or show that it meets the notability guidelines for academics. It is now wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references. As a matter of policy, all biographies of living people will be deleted if they do not have references. You say that the text is written by its subject, which is about as far from an independent verifiable source as it's possible to get.

It was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include:His lab is engineering solutions... one of the top innovators in the world... acclaimed mentor and innovator... top mentor among all faculty... most innovative graduate student. You really must have in-line references to proper sources if you are going to make such claims, otherwise it's an unsourced hagiography.

 Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:03, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


 * As per the instructions, email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. As with the rest of Wikimedia, it will be dealt with by volunteers, usually takes a few days. Note that this only fixes the copyright problem. A self-penned biography is not an independent, reliable source, and the language is not neutral. If the text is reposted with copyright clearance but no other changes, it may well be deleted again. You would do better to rewrite from scratch with proper references and an encyclopaedic tone. Hope this helps  Jimfbleak  -  talk to me?  07:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the email. I would normally post text I have deleted, but I can't when it's infringing someone's legal copyright. The text was copied from the Harvard site, and only they can give permission for it to be released under a Wikipedia-compatible licence. Jeffrey Karp can't give permission on behalf of the university. If the university text is identical to and later than a website that he controls, then that's another matter. Even if he is in a position to release the copyright, you would still need to address the issues of independent reliable sources, and the self-promotional language  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  15:20, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * I looked at the other two biographies you mentioned Ali_Khademhosseini had multiple sources and was not a copyright violation. The tone was a bit promotional, so I edited it lightly. Robert S. Langer was OK as it stood  Jimfbleak  -  talk to me?  15:30, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * To release the text, Jeffrey needs to send the text to the foundation from an email associated with him, as described above. You cannot copy directly from any website legally unless it explicitly says it is PD or CC-BY-SA 3.0 licensed. Honestly, it would be much simpler to write in from scratch in your own words with proper references  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  16:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC)