User talk:Matti1003

Unspecified source for Image:Hulio.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Hulio.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:44, 13 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Sunshine Man 17:44, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Julian Dobrowolski
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Julian Dobrowolski, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Julian Dobrowolski seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Julian Dobrowolski, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Julian Dobrowolski itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Warning
Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users. Jogers (talk) 21:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Julian Dobrowolski
I've nominated Julian Dobrowolski, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Julian Dobrowolski satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Julian Dobrowolski and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Julian Dobrowolski during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jogers (talk) 21:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Julian Dobrowolski
Any material on Wikipedia needs to be attributable to a reliable published source. The article you created doesn't cite your sources. Jogers (talk) 21:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)


 * You can cite the newspaper (with article's title, the author and the date of publication) in the "References" section at the end of the article. Some external links would be desirable in order to convince people that the article is not a hoax. Please remember to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). Jogers (talk) 22:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)