User talk:Mattia332

Welcome!
Hello, Mattia332, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Qajar dynasty. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 17:48, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Nicholas II of Russia
Hello Mattia332, please note the article name of the link. If you revert again, I would have to report you on the edit war page. Regards --Serols (talk) 15:37, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Mentioned for edit warring on Nicholas II of Russia
Hello Mattia332. An editor has complained about your edits of Nicholas II of Russia. Please see User talk:EdJohnston. You can respond there if you wish. Please be aware of the WP:Edit warring policy. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hi Mattia332! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:20, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * And here is the diff. -The Gnome (talk) 21:44, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Mattia332, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Juan Carlos I have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted.  All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 22:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 09:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * In short, why should the coat be a poor heraldric representation of the Canadian coat when a fair use rationale exists for the official coat? Feel free to discuss it on the article's talk page. Walter Görlitz (talk) 09:38, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

June 2021
Hi Mattia332! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 16:11, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Austria-Hungary - RfC: National flags vs Civil Ensign
Hello Mattia332. You are invited to discuss the question of which flag(s) should be used in Austria-Hungary's infobox because you recently participated in the editing of the Austria-Hungary article regarding this. The discussion can be found at Talk:Austria-Hungary. Conrad Caribou (talk) 16:56, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to House of Savoy. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please provide a reference that is not based on a blog / personal website / fansite. 10mmsocket (talk) 18:56, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Kyiv offensive (2022), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 14:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, please note article name and Article_titles. --Serols (talk) 14:31, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hey, I don't want to leave a canned message about constructive editing but just wanted to reach out about something I have noticed about your edits this month. On the article for Austria, you edited the page to feature ahistorical information. I presume this was for a screenshot. While generally innocuous, edits like that constitute vandalism and can cause both immediate problems and latent issues. If you wish to experiment or play with infoboxs so information can match your alternate reality (a perfectly acceptable way to practice Wikipedia skills), please do so only in preview or on your own draft/sandbox page. As for your edit on Catholic Church, deletion of consensus-added sentences is inappropriate. If something in the lede of a core article like that strikes you as inappropriate, try taking the matter to the talk page to see if there has been prior discussion or to establish new consensus. Thanks! ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Era style change violated WP:ERA
This edit. CE was added January last year, it never had AD, so your change without discussion has been reverted. Doug Weller talk 13:43, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing until you see the warnings on your talk page and start responding. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 13:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

So it's easy to get unblocked. Doug Weller talk 13:46, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Mattia332 (talk) 07:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

DS Notice: Eastern Europe
signed,Rosguill talk 19:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

— Red-tailed hawk  (nest) 03:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

2022 Russian mobilization
Hey. Please note that there is a new general sanction; only extended-confirmed users are allowed to edit articles related to the Russo-Ukrainian War (WP:GS/RUSUKR). Additionally, The New York Times is a newspaper of record and considered a reliable source (WP:RSP). Prolog (talk) 11:55, 1 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I'll take note, thanks Mattia332 (talk) 16:36, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Most of your edits this year are in violation of the sanctions. These restrictions are not optional. Prolog (talk) 21:12, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Pahlavi Iran, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 04:15, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

License tagging for File:Ukraine according to Russia.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Ukraine according to Russia.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to engage in subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, as you did at Yalta, you may be blocked from editing. Rauisuchian (talk) 03:26, 19 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Subtle vandalism? Excuse me? Why are you accusing me of such a thing? I'm simply trying to do my part in Wikipedia and enforce the NPOV Rule that its clearly laking in pages such as Yalta, giving a neutral point of view, since currently it has an overwhelming ukranian goverment Rhetoric POV, which goes against Wikipedia's guidelines. Wikipedia's job is to show a neutral POV that displays both sides Mattia332 (talk) 14:50, 19 March 2023 (UTC)


 * According to the United Nations, Crimea is part of Ukraine. WP:NPOV (neutral point of view) means to reflect the significant viewpoints in reliable sources (WP:RS). It doesn't mean to reflect all sources including fringe and propaganda as otherwise articles would be weighed down by undue weight of excess ramblings outside of what real sources say (see WP:UNDUE and WP:RSUW). The most NPOV thing to do would be to 1. use the United Nations-recognized definition and 2. use reliable sources, which reflect the United Nations-recognized definition. -- Rauisuchian (talk) 07:12, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Fair enought, though I didn't knew WIkipedia based itself off the UN's opinions, specially because of all it's criticism against it; more over the Yalta article has not a UN wording but a clearly ukranian rhetoric one Mattia332 (talk) 13:07, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

July 2024
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Mariupol for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 21:43, 15 July 2024 (UTC)