User talk:Mattlandis

3CX IP PBX
A tag has been placed on 3CX IP PBX, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of 3CX IP PBX and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Calltech (talk) 18:20, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

I would be glad for some specific tips on how to remove advertisement style on 3CX IP PBX. I've read WP articles but can't detect advert style (in my own writing I guess.) I'm very interested in have a neutral article. Mattlandis (talk) 21:24, 25 November 2008 (UTC)mattlandis
 * Take a look at Neutral point of view and the notability guidelines for companies. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Lack of neutrality
The article as written does not present a neutral overview of the organization. Statements such as the following:

"...whose aim is to be dominant in the Windows based IP PBX market..."

is pure marketing fluff. It is difficult (if not impossible) for a user who has a business relationship or is an owner of an organization to create an article about it without this type of hyperbole. WP guidelines strongly recommend that users do not write these types of articles about their orgs. Instead, they can recommend the article be written by a neutral third party. (This can be done on the article talk page). None of the above reflects in any way badly on the organization (3CX IP PBX). It could be the greatest thing since sliced bread, but since WP is an encyclopedia and not a forum to promote an agenda, product or organization, I recommend that you stop writing about it yourself and have others contribute. By others, I do not mean others from 3CX IP PBX, but from the industry who have unbiased knowledge about the topic and can present both Pros and Cons about it. Calltech (talk) 12:51, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Calltech, hey I actually just added that last night. What was advert before that? And the reason was because there was an independent analyst that said it. I will remove it then I'd like to hear the advert issues (so i can recognize it in other contributions I my make related to other subjects). Once again very much Thanks Mattlandis (talk) 12:58, 26 November 2008 (UTC)mattlandis

Image copyright problem with File:3CX Company logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:3CX Company logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:19, 27 December 2008 (UTC)