User talk:Mattobluey

AfD nomination of Liberty (Machinima Series)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Liberty (Machinima Series), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Liberty (Machinima Series). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Drat (Talk) 14:43, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to User:Cliff smith has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. –  iride scent  01:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liberty (Machinima Series) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. D ARTH P ANDA talk 01:18, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Deletion discussion
RE: Your reverted comment - It seems that you are under the impression that Wikipedia is a free advertising vehicle to help you promote your series. It is not. Please read Conflict of interest for more information.--Drat (Talk) 01:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Themfromspace (talk) 06:32, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User:Drat. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Pinkadelica (talk) 06:34, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:Drat. Double Blue (Talk) 06:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. --Drat (Talk) 10:38, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Mattobluey
User:Mattobluey, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mattobluey and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Mattobluey during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Drat (Talk) 08:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Pursuant to the above discussion: your userpage has been deleted. Please feel free to continue to edit Wikipedia in a positive manner; but, be aware that we have very strict guidelines regarding self-promotion, spam, and advertising. Further, Wikipedia is not a webhost. I encourage you to continue your involvement with our community. Regards, Lazulilasher (talk) 22:30, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Wranga
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Wranga, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. CultureDrone (talk) 10:39, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Trangie, New South Wales, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''I see no reason why you should not be indefinitely blocked as a vandalism-only account. You have been warned ...'' Mattinbgn\talk 10:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 08:51, 23 April 2010 (UTC)