User talk:Mattsbach

April 2014
'Re: the Oscar (opera)'' article, I'm not sure what you think you are achieving by BLANKING HUGE SECTIONS from the article. These two "edits" have been reverted. Why you would remove references is beyond me......

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Viva-Verdi (talk) 20:15, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

RESPONSE
I was trying to removing negative reviews. I don't know who put those in there and I plan on adding more positive reviews once I get them. This was not an attempt to be malicious in anyway. I have very little experience with Wikipedia guidelines, and so if this appeared as vandalism I am sorry and I will educate myself before making more edits. Mattsbach16:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your explanation. Any time that a whole chuck of a page (or section) is removed - with its headline as well - it can only be assumed to be deliberate - and therefore it is vandalism.  The other thing which you can also do is to post some comments/explanations onto the article's "Talk" page when you make such dramatic changes.  That may then prompt discussion amongst editors and a consensus may be reached.


 * In regard to the negative reviews, I think that we must maintain a balance of positive and negative if both have appeared in reputable sources. (Now, fyi, I live in Santa Fe and saw the production - twice! - and have to agree with some of the negative comments. Viva-Verdi (talk) 20:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dominik Maican


A tag has been placed on Dominik Maican requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  A m i t  웃  20:17, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Park Rx America
Hello, Mattsbach,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Park Rx America should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Park Rx America.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Meatsgains (talk) 02:39, 11 October 2017 (UTC)