User talk:Mattsky

Lets start a Mattsky talk page. Mattsky (talk) 00:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

June 2012
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Brett Kimberlin. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:25, 12 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Bbb23 there is nothing wrong with the source I used.
 * Yup, there is. As already stated: WP:BLPPRIMARY. There are other reasons not to include the material as well. There's some discussion on the Talk page. Take your views there.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:51, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Lexisnexis is a solid source with no bias. The discussion page is useless. You think that suing a US Senator is not noteable.. That is simply ridiculous. You have been told that by a few people. Would me chiming in change your mind?

Hello Mattsky. I just noticed that you reverted an edit this morning at the Brett Kimberlin article with the comment "Why was this removed?" At first glance, I too thought the edit by MarkOfBondi was vandalism or section blanking. But a closer look shows that what he actually did was put the SWATting information in its own section, just below the paragraph on Litigation. I feel this was a good edit and I think it would be best to revert back to it. It seems like a logical division and I think reorganizing the article that way will encourage other editors to expand both sections as new source material is uncovered. Holler back at me if you feel otherwise. Belchfire (talk) 19:00, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

I screwed up. I didn't see the new section and just thought the swatting was simply removed. Sorry about that. I agree it is a good edit and I'll leave it alone.

Mattsky (talk) 19:46, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
 * FYI, I'm not a Kimberlin Groupie. The problem is that this is a flagrant violation of the BLP rules that are set aside for them.  I'm afraid you are now at 3RR and cannot revert anymore.  It simply cannot be inserted in.  I'm protected by the rules since I would fall under #7.  If you undo it again, I'm afraid I will be forced to report you.  ViriiK (talk) 00:24, 27 August 2012 (UTC)