User talk:Matttoms

ANE/Central Asia
Feel free to add it with source. I just wanted to reflect the source from the article. You can add info about ANE and Malta. Aisha1112 (talk) 20:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If you dont know how to cite, just send me the link of the source. I can add it for you.Aisha1112 (talk) 20:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * So you are the ipv6 that i reverted before? Anyway, i am not going to open a SPI case about you(despite there are still dubious things regarding you). Because i noticed that some of your removals were legitimate, especially regarding the map. Aisha1112 (talk) 21:39, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Sanctions
- Sitush (talk) 12:01, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Your recent editing history at Saint Thomas Christians‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 14:38, 24 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Please see the discussion on the article talk page. Your source is unreliable and there is indeed consensus not to include such information in India-related social group articles. You claim to be a new contributor to Wikipedia, so I am not sure why you are so adamant that the consensus is otherwise. - Sitush (talk) 15:04, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

South Asians are not from Mars, they are a diverse ethnic group just like everyone else on the planet. Genetics is pertinent to every other ethnic group and is displayed on every wiki page. It is valid and pertinent to South Asians as well.User:Matttoms Free flow of information is what makes wikipedia beneficial to me and everyone on the planet. Do not try to restrict the type of Information that is going to be displayed. Genetics information will be displayed on south asian Wikis, unless it is removed from every other ethnic group wikis User:Matttoms
 * This "free flow" is neither here nor there. Half or more of your edits here are part of an edit war and you are this close to being blocked indefinitely per WP:NOTHERE. Drmies (talk) 00:45, 25 September 2017 (UTC)