User talk:MattyNeth

Regarding your edit to Sean Payton:
Your recent edit to Sean Payton (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 13:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Payton_with_Coach_Raitz.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Payton_with_Coach_Raitz.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MECU ≈ talk 03:37, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Sean_Payton_v_Nottingham.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Sean_Payton_v_Nottingham.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MECU ≈ talk 03:37, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Bournemouth raiders
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bournemouth raiders, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.britballnow.co.uk/raiders. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:16, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "AFC Nay"
A page you created, AFC Nay, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a club or other organization, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for organizations in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 15:40, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AFC Nay football club
Hi I noticed you created the page Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AFC Nay football club back in August but haven't edited it since. You can take as long as you like with a draft, but if you leave it more than six months between edits we may assume you have given up and delete the page. If you want to be sure of keeping this submission you need to re-commence working on it within the next 2-3 months.

If you have decided you no longer want to work on this page, edit it (using edit source if you have two edit tabs) to include the text   and an admin will remove it for you. Rankersbo (talk) 15:09, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AFC Nay football club concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AFC Nay football club, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AFC Nay football club


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AFC Nay football club, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
 * It is a rejected submission at Articles for creation, and it has not been edited in over a year. (See section G13 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. &mdash; rybec   02:10, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of British Gridiron Football League


A tag has been placed on British Gridiron Football League requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Skeletor3000 (talk) 20:49, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of British Gridiron Football League for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article British Gridiron Football League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/British Gridiron Football League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 07:26, 24 February 2020 (UTC)