User talk:Mattythewhite/Archive 8

FLCs
Cool, I'll head over there. While you're floating around that place, cast a glance at my latest offering, Ipswich Town F.C. seasons, which I'm just about to place at WP:FLC. Cheers! The Rambling Man 17:03, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh, and I'm not sure it's good practice to have a PR and FLC/FAC running simultaneously, so I'd axe the peer review if I were you. The Rambling Man 17:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi Matty, thanks for your comments. I think I've addressed the ones I think I can, the website thing, not sure what's best really so I've left it - hope my explanation makes it clear.  Perhaps, if you're now happy, you could support?  Cheers!  The Rambling Man 18:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Real Madrid
Great cleanup work in progress! Keep it up; I'd give you a Barnstar except I gave you one rather recently, right? ;) → j acĸrм  (  talk  |   sign  ) 19:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeh there was a problem with Current squad, as it was typed like this: Current Squad, but it's been fixed now so no problem NapHit 13:51, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

real madrid
Hi! Great work at Real Madrid C.F. article. I worked a lot, too. I'm sure that together we can make Real Madrid a featured article.--Hadrianos1990 06:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Michael Keeping
Thanks for the note. It seems that he is - my reference book says that he was appointed Real Madrid "coach" in February 1949 (so the dates don't quite tally), and then went on to manage Poole Town. Daemonic Kangaroo 11:19, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

James Milner Off the pitch section
Over the past few weeks I’ve been researching desperately to try and expand this section. But for the most part I can only find very trivial facts. Another user has told me that off the pitch sections are not mandatory and in this case it would be best to remove it completely. I’m not so sure, however minor his off the pitch activities might be it would be useful to give an idea of what he’s like as a person.

Please give me your views. Should it be expanded, removed completely or charged in some other way. Please give your views in the Milner Off the pitch section on my talk page. Buc 16:36, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Frank Barson
England "A" there is such a thing the A team. It was different to the full England squad he has one cap for England A he never played for "England" just thought you would like to know. Everlast 1910 19:55, 16 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Every Villa player me and Woodym555 do we use this website and his bio on here says England A but if it was full England i'm sorry! Everlast 1910 20:09, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

real madrid
yep! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hadrianos1990 (talk • contribs) 16:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Do this
Pls try to find dates to complete the Managers table (Arthur Johnson and Juan de Carcel; nr. of matches,wins,draws,fails)--Hadrianos1990 16:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

keep up the good work
Gridge 21:41, 20 September 2007 (UTC).

Seconded, many thanks for reverting all the mindless vandalism on the Scarborough Athletic F.C. page. Seadog365 22:41, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Michael Evans (footballer)
Hi. Not sure why the one who played twice for York couldn't have just had a new page rather than moving the existing one for a much more notable player, but maybe you could have also corrected the now incorrect links that you made when moving the page? Also the talk page for the new one just goes to the talk page for the old one. No idea how you fix that, but thought I'd let you know. WikiGull 07:46, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

OK, that's fair enough, but it still would have been a good idea to correct the wrong links that it created. WikiGull 15:05, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Your list of York players
Hi, noticed that one of your sub-pages is a list of all York players. You may have seen that I've something similar for Torquay players (User:WikiGull/Torquay United). One thing I do is keep the red links and players I've not worked on seperate to those I have worked on. Makes it easier to spot when you need to change a link and if someone has started a page on a player you know about then you can obviously add to it. Not telling you what to do, but just in case it's useful, I thought I'd let you know. WikiGull 15:23, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Mackem
Hello, I know that the article Mackem isn't exactly football related, but can you help out on Peer review/Mackem‎? and tell me if the article is ready for a GA nominee? The sunder king 17:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Thank your for your help. I never noticed any of that. I will sort that out, and slowly work it towards GAC. The sunder king 17:35, 21 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok then I've done mostly everything that you said could improve the article on it's peer review. I re-referenced with the dates with titles, cleaned it up and removed POV pushing. The sunder king 18:04, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

real madrid cf
I've renominated Real Madrid to FA. The previous GAC needed closing (sorry for that).But trust me! It won't fail again! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hadrianos1990 (talk • contribs) 15:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Chris Senior
Why's the article being considered for deletion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sepmix (talk • contribs) 21:20, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

NP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sepmix (talk • contribs) 21:23, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Nick Wright
I understand you creating the dab page, but when you do that, you're supposed to update the links as well. GreenJoe 17:47, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. Thanks for the help. GreenJoe 18:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

LuaLua
Hi Matty. Thanks for the message, I'm happy with a GAC nomination though I'm not sure what's involved. I have it half in my mind to do a little more work on his international career, would that throw a spanner in the works? Cheers, --Malcolmxl5 22:05, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Question you may be able to help with
Hi Matty

According to the project's booklist you've got Football League Players' Records 1888 - 1939 - would you be able to do me a massive favour and look up if there's any details on where Roy Bethell or Dave Whitelaw might have played after leaving Gillingham and when they left the club? Roger Triggs' book on the history of the Gills has this data missing, with the result that List of Gillingham F.C. players has a couple of unsightly question marks on it....

Cheers!!!!

ChrisTheDude 13:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Many thanks for that Matty! I'm not sure what to do about the discrepancy in Bethell's stats, though...... ChrisTheDude 14:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I've just signed up for allfootballers.com and they agree with your book on Bethell's stats and also give a different number for those of Wally Battiste (149). Would you be able to give me the page numbers on which those two players' stats appear so that I can cite your book rather than Triggs'?  (allfootballers.com gives the same stats as are already in the article for all other pre-war players......) ChrisTheDude 15:21, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Whoops, sorry, I meant Bethell and Wally Battiste.... ChrisTheDude 15:25, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Many thanks, that's massively appreciated and I'll leave you alone now :-) ChrisTheDude 15:30, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ycfc match programme.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ycfc match programme.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:54, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Jeff Forsyth
A template has been added to the article Jeff Forsyth, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. ArtVandelay13 21:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Eddie Anaclet
A template has been added to the article Eddie Anaclet, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. robwingfield «T•C» 01:57, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hull old badge.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Hull old badge.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Nominated

 * Several of your york city categories have been nominated for deletion, please see . The sunder king 16:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Anthony Lloyd
Hi,

Not sure if you added them, but do you not think the sub-headings on the Anthony Lloyd page are a bit ridiculous. Lose them and we can have flowing prose rather than the stilted and repetitive text we have now (with things like one line per subheading). Am happy to revise it, but seeing as you edit it a lot thought I'd run this past you first. WikiGull 16:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Nice one, looks much better. WikiGull 19:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Eddie Anaclet
I see that you have re-instated the Prod - As it says in the article's talk page, he has played for a professional club albeit briefly as a sub in an FA Cup match, but that makes him (just) notable, so I think the prod should be removed. --Daemonic Kangaroo 19:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm rather surprised that you re-instated the prod as you appear to have created the article in the first place and the prod was removed by an administartor rather than a "random" editor!. --Daemonic Kangaroo 19:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Lee Protheroe
You've also prodded this article. I came accross this using the "Random article" tab at the left. Having checked his history, it seems that this article should go as he doesn't appear to have plyaed for a fully professional team. --Daemonic Kangaroo 19:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Nélson de Jesus Silva‎
Hi Mattythewhite. You recently assessed the Nélson de Jesus Silva‎ article, however at the time it was suffering from some vandalism. You may wish to reassess it, and I would also appreciate if you could check the talk page, and the material which I restored, since you appear to be more familiar with the content than me. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

PROD
A PROD tag can be removed by anyone for any reason. Disagreement is NOT sufficient basis to restore the tag. The only times the tag can be restored are 1) when it is removed as part of blatant vandalism or 2) it is replaced with a CSD tag (in which case the CSD tag should be left and the PROD restored). Once anyone disagrees in good faith, PROD is not available as a deletion option. So this edit by you was improper. If you believe the article should be deleted, you can use AFD. GRBerry 19:41, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Red Links
I am removing them, because if there is no article for them to link to, then there needn't be a link for them, I do try and remove things such as (footballer) in the preview, if the don't work, i simply remove the link to make the article look better. El-Nin09  20:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

James Milner FAC
I don’t know if you’re aware but James Milner is a current FAC. It has been one for about two weeks now but so far only one user has provided feedback. Since have given feedback on this article in the past I hope you can provide some here. In particular the flow of the writing as that seem to be the main thing holding it back at the moment. Buc 09:57, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Eddie Anaclet
An article that you have been involved in editing, Eddie Anaclet, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. robwingfield «T•C» 23:23, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Book
Hi Matty

Could you do me a huge favour and look up two more players in the pre-WWII football leage records book? The players are George Dorsett and his brother Joe - could you confirm that the book lists them (assuming it lists place of birth) as both having been born in Brownhills, and if so what page(s) this info is on?

Many thanks!!!!

ChrisTheDude 15:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Many thanks Matty. In between my football edits I've been doing some work on Brownhills as a favour to my wife, who comes from the town, and finding anyone to list in the "famous people" section has been like looking for hay in a big stack of needles :-) ChrisTheDude 06:57, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

FL Main page proposal
You either nominated a WP:FLC or closed such a nomination recently. As such, you are the type of editor whose opinion I am soliciting. We now have over 400 featured lists and seem to be promoting in excess of 30 per month of late (41 in August and 42 in September). When Today's featured article (TFA) started (2004-02-22), they only had about 200 featured articles and were barely promoting 20 new ones per month. I think the quality of featured lists is at least as good as the quality of featured articles was when they started appearing on the main page. Thus, I am ready to open debate on a proposal to institute a List of the Day on the main page with nominations starting November 1 2007, voting starting December 1 2007 and main page appearances starting January 1 2008. For brevity, the proposal page does not discuss the details of eventual main page content, but since the work has already been done, you should consider this proposal assuming the eventual content will resemble the current content at the featured content page. Such output would probably start at the bottom of the main page. The proposal page does not debate whether starting with weekly list main page entries would be better than daily entries. However, I suspect persons in favor of weekly lists are really voicing opinions against lists on the main page since neither TFA nor Picture of the day started as weekly endeavors, to the best of my knowledge. See the List of the Day proposal and comment at WP:LOTDP and its talk page.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 19:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Real Madrid
Please follow [|this link] and vote for Real Madrid as this week's football article improvement drive collaboration! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hadrianos1990 (talk • contribs) 08:10, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Sunderland images
Good of you to provide pictures for all of the Sunderland players, but I have one question. Who took these? and how do you know that the license is free. The sunder king 14:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I hate to question, but is there really a need for those images if nearlly all of them have their backs turned? The sunder king 14:29, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Gills players FLC
Just to let you know I've addressed the points you raised yesterday. On another note, I see the closest senior football team to my house have been drawn against your boys in the cup - try to keep the score down to a respectable level ;-) ChrisTheDude 11:16, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Featured list candidates/List of Norwich City F.C. Players of the Year
Thanks for updating the list at WP:FOOTBALL with the FLC nomination --Dweller 09:40, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

0 template
Hi Matty, I noticed a few people did it for some of the players at Newcastle United, and felt that even if not completely necessary, it added quite nicely to the layout. I'll leave it though if it's frowned upon. Thanks. Doberman Pharaoh 21:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, I understand where you're coming from, it was just my opinion that the extra 0s made the columns a bit more seperate and frankly better looking. It seems there's no specific way of doing it but I'll leave it how it is. Thanks. Doberman Pharaoh 21:25, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

List of Ipswich Town F.C. players
Hi Matty. I hate to 'spam' but since you've been so useful in the past and generous with your time, I've come calling again to see if you'll help review and push List of Ipswich Town F.C. players to featured list status. It's recently been completely overhauled, so I've kicked off a peer review which I'm hoping you'll contribute to. Thanks in advance, The Rambling Man 16:46, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your contributions at the peer review. I've taken the bold step of moving the list over to WP:FLC so I'd be grateful for your support/comments etc there.  Thanks again.  The Rambling Man 16:15, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Loans
If the player goes back from his loan spell, and then signs for the club, it's two spells. But if the player signs up permanently while on loan, it's one. ArtVandelay13 17:13, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Invatation
Hello Mattythewhite, I am inviting you to join the Alien Research Wiki a wiki devoted to research on life in outerspace, UFO incidents, and many other related non-fictional topics. Original research is allowed. I am just seeing if you would be intrested. The sunder king 21:44, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Jamie Chandler
is the sunderland player Jamie Chandler notable? after all he is "partly" in the first team and I have a reference of him playing and scoring for England U19. see. The sunder king 13:08, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Well he is a professional premier league player, and he is in the first team. The sunder king 13:12, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Would it be possible to un-delete the page or would you have to re-write it.--Sunderland06 15:22, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry to say
But I have scrapped supporting sunderland, I've had enough of the team kicking its own fans in the face with their rubbish performances, rubbish managers, rubbish players and generally terrible form. I am not a glory hunter but I am thinking of supporting a club which you can actually have pride in supporting (Not a giant like Arsenal, Chelsea, Man Utd or Liverpool). Any suggestions? The sunder king 18:57, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Lol I don't think so... I don't like them anyway. If sunderland manage to get back on track I might start supporting them because I will get pride and not humiliation. I like Plymouth Argyle, QPR, Darlington F.C. and F.C. United of Manchester. The sunder king 19:02, 21 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Maybe a username change The Darlo King, maybe. lol. --Sunderland06 19:29, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Jack Pelter number
Hi, i received a email from martin walker (safc) enquiries, which said his number is 26, this is not a source is it.--Sunderland06 19:36, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

York list
Hi. To me, a "clubman" is in the lyrics of Wham!, the opposite of a "pubman" and is about where you like to go out in the evenings! Seriously, what about List of York City F.C. Players of the Year? Makes it consistent with the NCFC article. --Dweller 13:16, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm... so what's it called then? Whatever it is called is, erm, what it should be called! WP:FOOTBALL is always a good idea. --Dweller 13:39, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * See The Rambling Man's advice on my talk page. As usual, he's talking sense. And if I were you, I'd create the redlink above as a redirect to the article you create. --Dweller 14:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * A fine idea. The Rambling Man 14:03, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Thierry Henry FAC
Hi there, if you're interested, the Thierry Henry FAC is now open. Thanks. Chensiyuan 15:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Lists
I'll see your FLC and raise you Peer review/Gillingham F.C. seasons :-) ChrisTheDude 12:04, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Sunderland A.F.C.
The semi-protection has just been took off the article and the ip vandalism has started instantly, probablys newcastle supporters.--Sunderland06 20:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ycfc match programme.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ycfc match programme.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:38, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Tamworth
Why are you removing the pictures of the Tamworth players on the current squad section? Stew jones 13:09, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Bootham Crescent
If it is a sponsorship name, it may well change in the future, as well as the fact that Bootham Crescent is also still the WP:COMMONNAME if you do a google search. A WP:Football discussion seemed to come to the conclusion that non-sponsorship names were preferable. пﮟოьεԻ  5  7  16:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Are you now in favour of the move? Your last comments on the discussion seem to suggest you are leaning that way. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  09:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Need help on checking a possible hoax
Hi Matthew - according to this you have a copy of Football League Players' Records 1888 - 1939. Could you please do me a favour and check to see if a Donald Mood ever existed, as the article claims? I can't find any record in my own reference books and I'm 90% sure it's a hoax, but I'd like to check a source that isn't published by Arsenal FC before I prod the article. Thanks. Qwghlm 10:48, 30 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the check-up. The article has indeed been deleted (technically, against policy as hoaxes are not part of WP:CSD) but if its recreated I'll prod it instantly. Qwghlm 15:54, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Want one
http://www.freewebs.com/ginnersleftfoot/record2.jpg

Surely must be incorped? Also, David Longhurst perhaps deserves a little padding - it was vs. Lincoln, televised and the jeff miller interviews cover the aftermath/effect on player safety. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Me677 (talk • contribs) 14:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Nice one
List of YCFC players now featured list, good work. I think we only need about 85 other dedicated editors and we can have every league club covered for Seasons, players, managers in no time! The Rambling Man 17:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
 * And thanks for helping correct loads of "my" templates! The Rambling Man 19:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Amjad Iqbal
Just a quick note about Amjad Iqbal. I noticed you un-redlinked him on the Farsley page for being non-notable. I know he's not played in the league but he is a Pakistani international. Would that count towards notability? Peanut4 22:16, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd say any international, whatever country, well at least if it's not a friendly, are as if not more notable than a lot of players in League 2. I'd actually spotted Iqbal had recently played for Pakistan and was going to add it to his entry when I realised he didn't have an entry. And I don't have enough info about him at all to even really start much of a stub. Peanut4 22:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Villa managers
Thanks for pointing out the rather glaring and embarrassing error in the Villa managers article. Don't know how that happened, rather annoyed at it actually. With regards to Ramsay, they must have just updated their database, it wasn't there when we made the list. Thanks again. Woodym555 22:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Spain=yes parameter
Hi, there is a Italy=yes parameter, do you know how i could make a Spain=yes parameter. Thnaks.--Sunderland06 11:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Ritchie Humphreys
Hello, I will be reviewing the above article that you nominated, to see if it is a Good Article. My current comments are on the talkpage already. Check back soon to see a full review. Regards, and good luck! FamicomJL 21:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I have reviewed the article, please go to its talkpage to see my review. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. FamicomJL 03:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Jimmy Hartnett
Hi. Added an article on this former York City player. One less for you to create Heshs Umpire 11:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

LOTD proposal
You have nominated a recent successful WP:FL. There have been two recent proposals to begin a List of the Day feature on the main page, which have both received majorities but have not been approved as overwhelming support sufficient for the main page. WP:LOTDP is a new proposal to try to get the ball rolling based on the original proposal. Voice your thoughts on its talk page.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 21:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:FOOTY
Hi Mate, we are staggering towards some kind of consensus at WP:FOOTY, please let us know what you think of the proposed notability criteria, regards King of the  North East (T/C) 00:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Stats
Thanks for the message, just to clear it up, You are not allowed to enter apperances and goals in info boxes?? Also wondered is there a reason why the Blue Square North is still refered to as Conference North. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattwinston (talk • contribs) 17:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC)