User talk:Maturity5476

Welcome!
Hello, Maturity5476, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Ashley Johnson have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:57, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I wanted to explain why I reverted your edit to Ashley Johnson. The problem is that your edit was unsourced, and I can't find any verification on Google that it's true.  What you need to do is locate a reliable source that says Johnson has appeared in Sky Rat.  Reliable sources include Variety, Entertainment Weekly, Deadline.com, TheWrap, and many other websites.  The key is that they need to have a history of fact checking, editorial control, and a professional staff.  Self-published blogs, user-generated content (such as the IMDb), and social media are not reliable sources.  Please do not add this content again without citing a source.  If you have trouble doing so, you can ask for help at the Tea House or on my talk page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:04, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Smallfoot (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Carniolus (talk) 21:31, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Emoji Movie. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''The content you added was not found in the source cited. Please do not misrepresent sources; this is disruptive.'' NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:33, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Good Dinosaur. Sum mer PhD v2.0 13:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 17:22, 12 June 2017 (UTC)