User talk:Maty.eth

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hyalinobatrachium nouns has been accepted
 Hyalinobatrachium nouns, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Hyalinobatrachium_nouns help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Hitro talk 06:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: NounsDAO (March 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tol were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NounsDAO and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NounsDAO, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:NounsDAO Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tol&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:NounsDAO reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tol (talk &#124; contribs) @ 14:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank your.
Thank your PeaceAndGood (talk) 00:09, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Nouns DAO for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nouns DAO is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nouns DAO until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. nearlyevil 665  21:59, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello Maty.eth. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Nouns DAO, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Maty.eth. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. nearlyevil 665  06:15, 30 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello nearlyevil, thank you for your message.
 * I have already answered what you are asking in the "deletion discussion page", as I was under the impression that that page was the right place to post it. Pasted bellow is a copy of that comment, In case I made a mistake and should have posted it here.
 * Firstly, let me say that I have made a mistake while creating the page and forgot to insert space between "Nouns" and "DAO" (so original draft was NounsDAO), which is why I created the second page "Nouns DAO". I was under the impression that this would create a draft as it did the first time, but it made the page public.
 * I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for making these edits on Wikipedia and I tried to write the article to the best of my ability, maintaining a neutral/formal tone without expressing any sort of favouritism. It seems there is a bias against cryptocurrency related projects and I understand why that might be the case, which is why I did not include any figures (treasury, donations, auction prizes), nor links to any auction page and made sure I did not encourage any sort of investment. I think the first 2 paragraphs about the Governance and Art are something that may not be significant for Wikipedia readers and could either be deleted or significantly edited, but the "notable actions" still seem notable and "wiki-worthy" to me. I fail to see what part of the article is not written in NPOV, I dont understand how (given the content of "Notable actions") this would not be notable enough, but I understand there could be more secondary sources (though i thought Yahoo Finance, Decrypt and Nat Geo would be enough).
 * Thank you for your time.
 * Hello everyone, I would like to explain a few things and ask you to reconsider.
 * I was not paid to write the article (this one nor the one about Hyalinobatrachium nouns) and I as an individual am not a member of the organisation, not am I financially invested in it in any way (although I do follow it very closely).
 * This is one of a few DAOs that is influencing the world outside of just cryptocurrencies and the internet, mostly working with charities and non-profits (donation to the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine, rainforest and animal conservation, revitalising skateparks and donating skateboards to children in need, ...).
 * It pushes the boundaries and tries to explore ways yet untraveled - e.g. first decentralised organisation with a big traditional company /BudLight/ as an active member, first DAO with animal species named after it, exploration of public domain (the whole project and all its assets released under Creative Commons 0 license /no rights reserved/, etc.
 * The actions the org. took so far does not suggest that it would work in anything but good faith, it does not promote anything illicit nor does it encourage people to invest in anything (unlike most cryptocurrency or NFT related projects). I understand your concerns about the lack of press coverage, but given that this project operates in a very small and specific niche and does not spend money on marketing campaigns (which would result in more attention and coverage), the lack of coverage from traditional media might be better understood. I do not think this outweighs the good impact of this project via its charitable actions nor its relevance, given the points highlighted in (3) - collaborations with BudLight, Brave, The Rainforest Trust, The Skatepark Project and David Horvath (all of which also have a dedicated Wikipedia page).
 * Would it help if I made changes to the article to highlight the "Notable actions" more and focus less on the "Artwork" and "Governance" which from the point of the greater public might seem less relevant? I specifically refrained from mentioning the size of donations and the DAO´s treasury, is that something that would increase notability?
 * If you still insist on proceeding with the deletion, is it possible to somehow archive the text so we can revisit it when/if there is enough coverage from secondary sources?
 * Maty.eth (talk) 08:05, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:NounsDAO
Hello, Maty.eth. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NounsDAO, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Nouns DAO for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nouns DAO is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nouns DAO& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)