User talk:Maud correa

Welcome!
Hello, Maud correa, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Data - the journal for Negative, Null and Inconclusive results (NNI results), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! David Eppstein (talk) 22:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Data - the journal for Negative, Null and Inconclusive results (NNI results)


The article Data - the journal for Negative, Null and Inconclusive results (NNI results) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This new journal does not even have any papers published in it yet, so it is too soon for it to have met any of the conditions of notability for academic journals.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Notability
Hi, just read your article on DNNI. I think this could easily be a Wikipedia article worth adding, but not now just four days after the journal has launched. (Personally to me - as a sciences person - it sounds like a really interesting project.) But right now not notable. As a separate issue (not your fault but it doesn't help) a bit confusing because of some unidiomatic English.

Why not wait a few months to years until the journal has begun operations and got some coverage and then think about submitting the article again? You'd really want to write the article as a draft in your sandbox, and show the draft to someone before it goes up on the main space. Maybe the teahouse project but I'd be really happy to help myself too. Maybe contact me on my talk page once it starts to get coverage and publish articles. Blythwood (talk) 22:23, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * As further comments: the article in its current form is almost certainly going to get deleted unless you have more proof of coverage. It's not notable yet. Wait and resubmit this article later after getting someone else with experience of Wikipedia to read through it before you publish it. (Think of it as like peer review - most articles are better for going through it.) User:David_Eppstein is right and I would follow his advice. (Just to be clear, removing a deletion template from the page doesn't do anything, just hides the notice.) Blythwood (talk) 23:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Data - the journal for Negative, Null and Inconclusive results (NNI results) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Data - the journal for Negative, Null and Inconclusive results (NNI results) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Data - the journal for Negative, Null and Inconclusive results (NNI results) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, as Blythwood states above, and unlike the case for the previous prod template, you should not remove the deletion template. Doing so will only get you in trouble and inflame the editors at the deletion discussion against you; it won't prevent the discussion from happening. Instead, please contribute your thoughts to the deletion discussion itself. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:59, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I am sorry for the deletion of the "deletion template". It was written that I could do it and that it will change nothing for the deletion discussion. So I prefered to not display this message.
 * I don't think you did anything wrong in removing the proposed deletion template. But you should not remove the deletion discussion template that is now there in its place. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:40, 22 December 2015 (UTC)