User talk:Maugrin/Collegium (ancient Rome)/UhOhSpaghettio378 Peer Review

Lead evaluation The updates made to the lead by the user are extremely effective in giving a brief overview of what a Collegium is. The original lead only gave a bare minimum definition of the collegium, but the additions made to the lead give a concise but effective explanation on its place in Roman society and why they are formed.

Content evaluation I think the content added really fleshes out the statement in the Lead that collegiums are legal entities, as the the information that has been added talks about the laws that regulate collegiums in depth. I do wonder if you should maybe also give a similar treatment to the religious collegia section in the original article because it is just bulleted lists of Latin names, with little actual information.  Tone and balance evaluation The content comes across as very neutral. It doesn't try to push any kind of opinion or agenda, it just states facts about the Collegia.

Sources and references evaluation Source authors and formats are diverse. The links to the websites all work. All of the sources do seem a little dated, the most recent being from 2011 and the oldest being 1973. However, I'm also personally not sure how often information on these kinds of things actually gets updated so a 10-year old article could not be as out of date as I think it is. The sources seem to cover a wide variety of specific topics in regards to collegia which is good.

Organization evaluation The new content is very well-written, I think it very clearly explains about civic collegia in only a couple of paragraphs. I would say that if you cannot find a source to back-up that one statement about needing only three members to be a collegia, than perhaps it can be deleted. In the second sentence of the second paragraph you have repeated "the implementation of".

UhOhSpaghettio378 (talk) 01:06, 20 November 2020 (UTC)UhOhSpaghettio378