User talk:Mauro.dalu

Speedy deletion nomination of Bible App - Bible Software, the Mac way


A tag has been placed on Bible App - Bible Software, the Mac way, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Cind. amuse  09:26, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Bible App - Bible Software, the Mac way, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 09:39, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Bible Study Software Notability
Things I specifically look at, to determine Bible Study Software notability are:
 * Distribution is gratis: Claimed number of downloads.
 * Distribution is gratis: Plausibility of those claimed numbers being accurate;
 * Distribution is non-gratis: Market share;
 * Distribution is non-gratis: Retail outlets that carry it;
 * Reviews in journals and websites that review Bible Study Software;
 * Discussions on the Internet by users of the specific program;
 * If the software is FLOSS, which *Nix distros include it;
 * What other programs the software developer has released;
 * Did anybody at BibleTech mention it?
 * Did anybody at an SBL conference mention it?
 * What functions, components, or capabilities it offers, that other Bible Study Software does not offer;


 * 1) An article created by a user is much more likely to survive AfD, than an article created by the company;
 * 2) Software that has a single point of distribution has a much higher barrier to being "notable", than software that does not have a single point of distribution;
 * 3) Software that does not have a strong user base, and provide good user support, is constantly in danger of being taken to AfD, and failing "notability" criteria;
 * 4) It is a lot more difficult for software aimed at general users to be notable, than software aimed at a specific audience;


 * Use Libronix as the model for how extensive your customer support systems have to be;
 * Use OliveTree as the model for how many different platforms your software has to run on;

p (talk) 21:01, 10 June 2011 (UTC)