User talk:Maurog/Archive 1

February-August 2007

Thanks
Thanks, I've blocked the user. In the future you can report vandals at Administrator intervention against vandalism. Take care, JACO  PLANE  &bull; 2007-02-22 16:08

Image:TCB Unfinished Cover.jpg
Hey, I noticed that you marked this image for speedy deletion with speedy-image-c. Note that template is used on article pages that include images for deletion. I've retagged the image with db-author, since your intent was to delete them image. If anything arises, you can always ask the administrator who deleted the image to consider undeleting it. Cheers, Iamunknown 20:25, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

DROD Monsters and Elements
Hi Maurog, I've added a deletion proposal to DROD Monsters and DROD Elements because I felt they were a bit too in-depth for wikipedia (see WP:NOT, but would probably be ideal for a gaming wiki like [Gamerwiki]; I hope you understand. Thanks, Marasmusine 17:38, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Your revert
Hi, thank you for correcting my error. However, I would urge you to be careful with your edit summaries; rvv was certainly not applicable for an honest mistake on my part. I was checking to see who had given a particular rating, and hadn't noticed I was editing an old version. Er rab ee 13:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Your WP:AIV Report
Thanks for your report regarding. I've blocked the user. Best, --Shirahadasha 13:50, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Marquette University High School
Do you even bother to read what you are reverting, or do you just blindly follow the recent changes page? I urge you to spend a little more time before you discard every major change as vandalism. Cheers, PaddyM 13:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No worries. Anyway, sorry my response was to attack your talk page.  Cheers, PaddyM 16:08, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Restoring prod tags
Someone removed a prod tag from an article and you reverted them with an edit summary which suggests you misunderstand the proposed deletion process. Ideally someone removing a prod tag would offer an explanation, but this is not required, as mere removal of a prod tag is sufficient to contest a proposed deletion. A prod tag should not be re-added unless it was removed in an act of obvious vandalism or page blanking. &mdash;dgies tc 06:26, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Moving my comment
Thanks, that was actually completely accidental leaving it on his userpage. I know it annoys me when someone does it to me, so thanks for moving it!--NeoNerd 11:59, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

AIV report
Thank you for making a report on Administrator intervention against vandalism. Administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. I have blocked the reported user although this has not occurred yet. But next time, please make sure the vandal receives a final warning. Also, you may want to subst your user warning templates when you add them to a vandals talk page. Thank you. — An as  talk? 10:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry Man
Hey Maurog, i was demonstrating to my class on how to edit the page; word was my example. anyways, i am really sorry for vandalizing it and I would also like to point out that I was on my way right now to remove my useless revision. Sorry again. --X-ecutioner 21:00, 31 May 2007 (UTC)X-ecutioner

Hipparchus_(disambiguation)
I deleted the page. There is some history that will need restoration after you have moved the page in. Please nudge me on my talk when this is done. Thanks Spartaz Humbug! 11:07, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * done Spartaz Humbug! 11:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Your recent report to WP:AIV
Thank you for making a report at Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Khu kri  08:53, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

vandalism
hi, thanks for reverting the vandalism to my user page, its much appreciated--Jac16888 12:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Just for info.
I've blocked the vandal you reported, but just for information we only say it's a single purpose account when it is actually an account and not an anonymous IP. If it is a single purpose account then we will give an indefinite block but the fact that it could be a dynamic ISP behind a service provider means there's a chance tomorrow it could be someone else. For this reason it's highly unlikely for us to give an indefinite block. Any other problems don't hesitate to give me a shout. Regard Khu  kri  13:05, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

signing
Alright. I must have forgot last time, hope this works. Gooogen 15:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of 'Neather
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on 'Neather, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because 'Neather is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting 'Neather, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 08:03, 25 August 2007 (UTC)