User talk:Mauryabhi7715

Mauryabhi7715 (talk) 10:19, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Mauryabhi7715, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Cabayi (talk) 09:09, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ullu App, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 09:09, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at MX Player, you may be blocked from editing. Cabayi (talk) 09:11, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Please stop inserting your opinion without any reliable, verifiable, independent sources. This won't end prettily if you persist. Cabayi (talk) 09:12, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Unsourced material Really? Please up to date your mind. Mauryabhi7715 (talk) 09:36, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

It's correct news sir.. I'm an Indian media person. Mauryabhi7715 (talk) 09:37, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
 * That just makes your unsourced edits even less excusable. Wikipedia doesn't care who you are, just about the verifiability of what you write. Cabayi (talk) 09:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

All Sources are available which I contribute, if you want know then find it. Mauryabhi7715 (talk) 09:53, 16 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Please refrained from adding unsourced material. defcon5 (talk) 16:34, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 16:46, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

reason= I'm a subscriber of ullu App and Mx player app so I know what's going on, which type Mx player making the series. And this time Ullu removed his controversial series which show sexual relation between Father in law and daughter in law. You can see on ullu app. Then what source you needed. It's not good for any contributer that, any one come and block him unnecessarily. Please unblock me sir... All sources are available which I have contribute. Mauryabhi7715 (talk) 19:33, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Paatal Lok, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate Talk 12:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

www.india.com/entertainment/ Anushka Sharma produced web series Patal Lok controversy. Is it not a reliable source? If this is not then what sources you needed. India.com a top website in India. Its a reliable source and I will go with ahead.

Mauryabhi7715 (talk) 12:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
 * No, India.com is a gossip/entertainment site. The additional Economic Times citation you added doesn't support the text. There is also a controversy section at the bottom which adequately summarises its controversies. Please avoid edit warring over it. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 12:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision diffs
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Cabayi (talk) 12:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Sourced content
How can I show that, our content is certified by sources. I mean, how do any senior Wikipedians judge that..which I edits or contribute in Wikipedia is unsourced material. Mauryabhi7715 (talk) 08:46, 17 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Six of the seven Seven of the eight messages previously left for you have contained links to guidance on what sources are needed and how to cite them. Read the messages, follow the links, read the guidance, follow the guidance. Cabayi (talk) 09:40, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Ullu App
The source you cite for "Every Indian web-series including Ullu Web series you watch, you will just find two things: Sex and Hinduphobia" actually says "Ramesh Solanki, a member of Shiv Sena IT Cell, has filed a police complaint against Netflix alleging that the US-based online streaming service is “defaming Hindus and India” through shows hosted on its platform." and "Almost every series on Netflix India...". Please, take more care that what you write as fact IS an objective verifiable fact, not a wishful confection which aligns with your personal beliefs. A neutral point of view is one of the five pillars of Wikipedia, not an optional afterthought. Cabayi (talk) 14:09, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Ullu App is NOT Netflix India
 * "Almost every" is NOT "Every" and
 * an allegation filed with the police by a political activist is NOT a fact.

January 2021
Hello Mauryabhi7715! Your additions to Tandav (TV series) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted.  All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page.   Thank you. ~RAM (talk) 10:18, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Ullu) for repeatedly adding unsourced attack material to the article.. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cabayi (talk) 08:26, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

ACCOUNT HAS BEEN BLOCKED
Sir, Which information I added in Ullu Wikipedia pages, that's all true. But I know my fault is, not given a references(Citation). So for this I'm sorry, we will next time try our best to Contribute this Wikipedia platforms. So please Unblock me ! Mauryabhi7715 (talk) 21:12, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * transferred from User talk:Cabayi
 * Truth and verifiability are not the same thing. What you call truth seems to be just your opinion.
 * You've been venting your opinion about Ullu for 8 months. You've been repeatedly cautioned about it. You've been blocked for it. Yet 8 months on, you're still being disruptive to the article in the same way. Nothing has changed.
 * Putting you in the position where you need to discuss changes to the article on its talk page, and having someone else implement them for you seems the least restrictive means of preventing further disruption to the article.
 * You may of course file an appeal here, as described in the block notice, for another admin to consider. Cabayi (talk) 08:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Putting you in the position where you need to discuss changes to the article on its talk page, and having someone else implement them for you seems the least restrictive means of preventing further disruption to the article.
 * You may of course file an appeal here, as described in the block notice, for another admin to consider. Cabayi (talk) 08:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Sir How can I file an appeal from another admin for unblock my account. Please tell me sir.. Mauryabhi7715 (talk) 17:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The process is described in the block notice above. Cabayi (talk) 12:31, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

ACCOUNT UNBLOCK
Please sir review my request and Unblock My Account for this pages like Ullu. Mauryabhi7715 (talk) 09:23, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Account unblock for Certain page editing
Sir but when my block will be lifted because there are no expire time. Please help me. Mauryabhi7715 (talk) 10:43, 11 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia has 0 other articles, yet in the weeks since I blocked you from editing Ullu you've shown no interest in editing any of them. Your only edits have been to request an unblock from that one article. You're creating a situation in which the longer you go without making any other positive contributions to the encyclopedia, the more you will appear to be focussed on attacking Ullu, & the longer the block needs to remain in force.
 * I'm not stating any conditions, just trying to show you how your behaviour appears to others. Cabayi (talk) 12:05, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Ok I will focus on other pages, and wait for this block lifted. Thanks Mauryabhi7715 (talk) 22:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Mauryabhi7715. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --Blablubbs (talk) 12:30, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Mauryabhi7715. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)