User talk:MausKappetijn

Your submission at Articles for creation: F1Maximaal (December 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:F1Maximaal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:F1Maximaal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:F1Maximaal Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nomadicghumakkad&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:F1Maximaal reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:52, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of F1Maximaal


A tag has been placed on F1Maximaal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. – NJD-DE (talk) 16:02, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello MausKappetijn. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to F1Maximaal, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:MausKappetijn. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. – NJD-DE (talk) 16:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

--MausKappetijn (talk) 16:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Reply: Hi, actually I'm just a Dutch motorsport fan and I figured there was not a page yet for F1Maximaal, which is why I created one. I'm not being paid to do so, or anything like that. I don't have any other interests than contributing to the Wikipedia mainspace for the topics I'm interested in. MausKappetijn (talk) 16:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Special:Permalink/1059851612: The role of Editor-in-Chief at F1Maximaal is currently fulfilled by four managing editors, namely Christian Moerman, Rick Pasker, Maurits Kappetijn and Terrence Riepema. It appears you do have a connection with that site. – NJD-DE (talk) 16:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Reply: Oh, I totally understand the confusion! The name is common in Dutch and it is not me (I wish I am though), it is also not family of mine.

--Sleevezipperr (talk) 16:36, 30 January 2022 (UTC)Hello, I just saw this discussion since I moved the page this afternoon and wanted to check in. I am Dutch too and can confirm that the surname is common, so it may be a coincidence. I won't interfere with any decision-making on this though, sorry.

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 19:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)