User talk:Maverick8823

Josh Epstein
Please note that Wikipedia is not an advertising or public relations platform — we are an encyclopedia, and our articles need to follow encyclopedic writing tone and maintain a neutral point of view. Additions to the article are always welcome if they can be properly sourced and written in a neutral manner, but it's not our role to publish value judgements, our own or anybody else's, about your acting abilities — we have to stick to the neutral facts of what you've done. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 03:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC) Hi The quotes that I put in there were all cited with a website and in quotations. First time using this sorry I don't understand what I did wrong. Best Maverick8823 (talk) 04:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The problem is the value judgements involved. We don't comment on actors' versatility or lack thereof, we don't characterize reviews as "glorious", and we don't quote individual critics' opinions of the actors' individual performances even if they are sourced — because the purpose of the article is to function as an encyclopedia article, not as an advertisement. We have to maintain a neutral point of view, not a promotional one. Bearcat (talk) 05:04, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

I totally understand those points and will never put those down again. So was the rest of the proper edits (reviews, other roles) taken down because of the other mistakes? If I put those up and cite them like I did with a neutral aim - will they then be accepted?