User talk:Maverick9119

December 2019
Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edits to Murder of Laci Peterson, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edits had to be reverted, because your edits violate a number of Wikipedia policies designed to maintain source integrity and neutrality, as they appear to have been motivated by a desire to promote the viewpoint that Scott Peterson was wrongly convicted of murder. Specifically:


 * In some cases, you removed material from the article that was supported by proper citations, without providing citations that established your claim that the information in question was incorrect, but merely your assertion.


 * In some cases, you added material supported only by a citation of the website PWC Consulting - Scott Peterson (https://pwc-sii.com/), whose stated goal is to promote the idea that Peterson is innocent of murder, and that his conviction was a wrongful one. This website would clearly not pass Wikipedia's Reliable Sources policy.


 * Lastly, in some cases, you added material that was not accompanied by any citation at all.

Similar edits were made five hours later by an editor using the username name account NightHawk0227.

Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here.

In addition, the personal opinions, analyses or commentary of editors cannot be added to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Removing material simply because you disagree with it is not permitted.

If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 20:07, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. You deleted valid, sourced content, along with a citation of a reliable source with this edit to Murder of Laci Peterson. You claimed in your edit summary that the information that the passage in the article related from the cited source was incorrect, but if that was the case, then the proper course of action would have been for you to correct. Not remove it wholesale, along with the citation that supported it.

This is not the first time you have made a disruptive edit to the article, as you have clearly done so in the past in order to push an agenda at odds not only with Peterson's conviction, but with the source-supported information in the article. This is a violation of WP:NOT, WP:DISRUPT, and WP:VANDAL. Please stop. If you continue this behavior, you risk being blocked from editing. Please do not make that necessary. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 17:13, 23 December 2019 (UTC)