User talk:Maveron

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Maveron


A tag has been placed on User:Maveron, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of User:Maveron and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 21:04, 5 March 2010 (UTC)


 * ...and I have deleted it a second time. Please read Wikipedia's policies and rethink your strategy. ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 21:51, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * ... and a third time. If you wish to discuss further, please do so here.  I have provided full reasoning above as to the inappropriateness of this page ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 00:50, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 72hrs from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Unblock discussion

 * Typically, Benchmark and Kleiner Perkins should not exist: the difference is notability established - those are not advertisements, they are stating the companies (Hewlitt Packard, Netscape, Google, etc) who were assisted by the corporations. Although notability is typically not transferable.  WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is no reason.  The part that made this especially bad is the fact that before I deleted it the first time (based on someone else's recommendation), I provided you with policies related to the Wikipedia.  You chose to create it again without discussion.  It was deleted again, and I again prompted you to discuss.  The third time it became apparent that communication was not going to exist.  Have you read WP:COI yet?  WP:PROMO?  WP:NOTABILITY??  I will personally not unblock you as it is clear to me that you have not read these core policies, and that the only reason you're finally communicating is because of your block ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 10:18, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * For your sake, I've redacted the email address in your unblock request - We tend to get a few cranks whose idea of a good time is email-bombing users. —Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 11:07, 6 March 2010 (UTC)