User talk:Mavronjoti

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your articles
I have suggested to the deleting administrator that the Perlat Musta page should be restored, since a footballer of national renown would qualify as notable. On the other hand, I have doubts about the notability of Bejto Isufi‎. Please note that all information you wish to add to Wikipedia must be supported by references to reliable sources.

The links you added to the Arvanites page don't qualify as such a reliable source, and I'll probably remove them again. Sorry about that. Please feel free to contact me on my talk page if you have any questions or want some help. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Kujdes
Ki kujdes nga keta shovinistet si ketu me lart.E kane mbuluar Wikipedine dhe po i hedhin pluhur historise se Shqiperise.Ne se ke nevoje per ndihme me thuaj.--Taulant23 (talk) 09:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Ai qe ta hoqi eshte Grek, ose me mire admin Grek,Lere lale se e kane ber lemsh fare,duhet disa veta ketu te mblidhen tek Wikipedia, duhen ndryshuar shume gjera.Gjithesesi jam gati te heq dore nga kjo mut Wikipedia,kush ti doje bytha vjen e shkruan care i do pushka.Mos harro te vesh firmen kur mbaron fjaline.E ke aty lart tek kutite e vogla.--Taulant23 (talk) 10:15, 21 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Hmmm, Mavronjoti, I don't know what Taulant and you have been saying here, unfortunately I don't read any Albanian. But I guess it was something to do with me in some way too... (LOL, at least I'm learning a new word of Albanian each day, budallallik, I can just about guess what that means... :-)
 * Anyway, I hope you aren't getting the impression the aggressive tone we've seen between Taulant and some other editors is the normal way of interacting in this place. It's not. So, I sincerely hope you'll be able to contribute in peace here. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Sotiris Ninis has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks Cometstyles 09:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Sotiris Ninis constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks Cometstyles 09:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC))

Mavronjoti, you really need to start discussing things instead of stubbornly editing against existing consensus when you've been repeatedly reverted by multiple other users. I know it can be frustrating, but it will only get more frustrating if you go on like that. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:39, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

You have violated the three-revert rule. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring.

It is pretty obvious that you are also editing as and you have been revert-warring on that article with your main account and the anonymous IP in alternation. I warn you that attempts at sockpuppeting will lead to blocks pretty quickly. I'll also warn you that administrators can impose further restrictions on you under the rules of this decision if you continue to edit in an uncooperative manner. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Indefinitely blocked
Requests for checkuser/Case/Dodona confirms that you are the banned user "Dodona" and that you have been using a number of sockpuppet accounts abusively to evade your ban. Accordingly, this account is indefinitely blocked. You are not welcome on Wikipedia. Do not return under any username, or your edits will be reverted and your account blocked without discussion. Sandstein (talk) 06:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

My e-friend I am in Tirana Albania and the IP adress you acuse me is in macedonia hello--Mavronjoti (talk) 17:25, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Unblocked

 * After further discussion of the checkuser results at Requests for checkuser/Case/Dodona and User talk:Burra, I have concluded that you are probably a different user after all, so I'm unblocking you. My apologies for the trouble, and thanks for your patience in dealing with this. I'll request that when you continue editing, please be careful to discuss things constructively on talk pages and avoid edit-warring. Thank you, Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:05, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Mavronjoti for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Dr.K. (talk) 23:56, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes,yes... I forgot to sign in because to upset with the bias entry that you try so hard to keep in place, by shuting up all the opposing voices and threating them with all kinds of violations and blocking... please be real, your credibility is on the line... The only reference you have brought in the entry "Joanis Capodistria" is other encyclopidias which by the way have made me to bring up a questions : Why is there a Wikipedia when you say that only Encarta and Britanica can be brought to reference, and if I want to change something in Wikipedia I have to try to send geniune copies to two encyclopedias before mentioned and try to change their entry first ?????? please don't you understand or you don't want to understand that wikipedia has come to be what it is because of the general believe that most studies published have political and bias tendency, so, to be able to see the truth on anything you must be able to read what other interpretations say on the given subject... but again you are not interested on that because it is a side of medalion which you have been told for so long not to see, your eyes and your mind are to weak to notice that the other truth can be possible as well...--Mavronjoti (talk) 08:48, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. I issued this block to give you a small break, as you are putting in your edit summaries, discuss before making changes. This does not include you putting your opinion down and then making the change, it involves dialogue achieving concensus and then make the change.

Mavronjoti, you've certainly noticed the climate on Balkan-related articles can be pretty hot. Please be careful in the future to avoid edit-warring and everything else that could highten tensions between editors. Please note that we as administers are pretty quick in applying blocks or other sanctions in this domain, see here for background.

That said, you can still use your user talk page here, even while you are blocked. If you want to go on discussing those sources you wanted to bring to the Kapodistrias article, it might be a good idea to do so now, right here. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Spo e marr vesh
Plako, spo marr vesh gjë! Pse po ziheni dhe pastaj pse na hyn në punë ky ne?--Taulant23 (talk) 07:26, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Gazmend Haxhia
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gazmend Haxhia, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://videolectures.net/gazmend_haxhia.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:47, 20 March 2011 (UTC)