User talk:Max1057

Voltron S8
In good faith, I am reaching out to you in regards to your edits to my content. It is clear that you are very passionate in regards to specific things on the page and I would much rather contact you this way than continuously edit and break the rules in regards to over-editing.

If you would like to comment further on the article itself, I will be opening a commenting section on both posts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesip lunati (talk • contribs) 15:12, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

I am ok with negative reviews being added. But you seem to be going out of you way that make it look like season 8 was mostly hated. The fact is that while there is some criticism from professional critics, most of the reviews are positive. It is not practical to add every single review to a Wikipedia page. Max1057 (talk) 03:36, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Max. There's actually over a dozen negative reviews from legitimate news sources, and even the most positive of reviews are also saying negative stuff. It's kind of disingenuous to say that the season was universally loved when it very, very much wasn't. The end in particular was not well-received by seemingly any review, positive or negative. So, it seems like you're kind of going out of your way to make it seem like the season wasn't as terribly-received as it was. Jesip lunati (talk) 12:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

I've just seen your comment on my talk page, and I apologize as well. I think that all opinions should be shown fairly, and it seemed quite unfair that we were both clearly very passionate in regards to our opinions. Jesip lunati (talk) 14:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Removal of video proof because the individual in question was "tired" is disingenuous at best, and outright manipulative at worst. Please stop removing sourced content because it doesn't fit into your narrative. Again, I am reaching out to you in good faith, hoping that you will realize that your bias is negatively impacting the quality of the content in question. Jesip lunati (talk) 06:20, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)