User talk:MaxPuckett

Your latest round
The reasons for including material in a Wikipedia article don't belong in the article itself, but rather in the article talk page, here Talk:False flag (which is where you should have started in the first place). AnonMoos (talk) 08:31, 14 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Reply: There is already enough discussion on the talk page and the opinion there is also that 9/11 should be mentioned. -- 08:34, 14 October 2008 MaxPuckett


 * Sorry Max -- you included no citations whatsoever to reliable sources, and furthermore, the function of Wikipedia article text is NOT to argue for what should or shouldn't be included in an article (discussions about such matters should occur on the article talk page). AnonMoos (talk) 08:41, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

In this case everything is all right. The discussion you can find on the talk page and the false flag operation is mentioned at the correct position of the article. I also linked to sources that are reliable because there are videos and so on.

You have been blocked from editing for in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for engaging in an  edit war. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.