User talk:MaxSem/Archives/December 2012

Saadus
This editor is requesting unblock, and you have commented on his request. Please note that in an earlier unblock request, now deleted by the editor, he claimed that his account had been hacked, and I refused unblock as a compromised account.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:02, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks - I see that you've already confronted him regarding that, good work. Max Semenik (talk) 16:03, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Electalive
Hi Max, just in the interests of full disclosure, I made these edits to WebEx probably before you saw it. Not trying to excuse Electalive, who is the architect of his/her own misfortunes, and clearly intends to respam if unblocked  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  09:46, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll leave a message explaining this difference. Max Semenik (talk) 09:56, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Your AfD vote
Per your recent vote at Articles for deletion/The7stars (2nd nomination), it appears information in the article had been removed prior to you coming to the AfD. This has now been rectified. Could you please go and give it another look? Thank you. Silver seren C 11:01, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

The Admin's Barnstar

 * Wow, thank you! :) Max Semenik (talk) 17:14, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

O'Dea
Your intervention is appearing as a decline at the User TP, although your intention was evidently to unblock. Can you please revisit? Don't know if the user is now actually unblocked. RashersTierney (talk) 23:18, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * D'oh:) Max Semenik (talk) 23:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Int21h
1) I assume you meant to redirect to his userpage?

2) As best I can tell, he still had potentially valid technical objections to the CU. As I noted in the bottom section there, if they are correct, it would put his anger and nastiness in a somewhat different light, albeit not excusing them. Or did I overlook a point where someone settled the technical side? In the reams of text he posted, it's quite possible I did. — Francophonie &#38; Androphilie  ( Je vous invite à me parler  ) 11:45, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Thanks, fixed. 2) I'm sure that he's pretty much over - if he's intermingling his requests with fuckyous, he's not seriously counting on being unblocked. And with his main argument, "show me the checkuser evidence against me", there's no chance of him being unblocked as a result of on-wiki process. Max Semenik (talk) 11:56, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. All those mailing list folks need a sound trouting, though, for those form letters they send out re most unblock requests. It seems that more often than not their responses lead to little incidents like this. — Francophonie &#38; Androphilie  ( Je vous invite à me parler  ) 12:00, 31 December 2012 (UTC)