User talk:MaxSem/Archives/January 2016

Talk page access
Hi MaxSem. Why did you remove the talk page access of Hamwil? While I share your concerns about the possibility of them being a sock, I see no evidence of disruptive or inappropriate comments and think they should be allowed to post there. Sam Walton (talk) 15:44, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I felt no point in allowing them to edit further because even the first request was a trolling timewaster. Dunno, maybe I was too stern but I really don't see this user going anywhere. If you disagree, feel free to undo my action, as per disclaimer on my userpage. Max Semenik (talk) 16:21, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

I appreciate Sam Walton for unblocking me. It isn't that he was not being stern enough, he was rational and fair. I write to you because you were not only unfair to me, but you also ignored, or didn't comprehend, the words that i wrote a few days ago. I said that I had been blocked. Not that i was a sock puppet, or that i was justly blocked. I 'admitted' nothing but that i had been prohibited from not only editing wikis, but my user page too. Hamwil (talk) 14:08, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I've done so. I think this could easily be a misunderstanding, though the possibility of sock puppetry is certainly very likely, but whatever the case nothing has warranted removing talk page access yet. I disagree that the unblock request was overt trolling, though perhaps I'm not being stern enough! Sam Walton (talk) 16:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)