User talk:Max Kibardin

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. If you post an article it will be assessed as it stands. If you don't want that to happen, you should write it as a draft. User pages are for you to write about your activities on Wikipedia, and are not for promotion. The short answer is that the article is not yet protected from creation, and you are not yet blocked, so you can write an article about him. However, you should read what follows very carefully before attempting to do so.

I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that he meets the notability guidelines. It is now Wikipedia policy that biographical articles about living people must have independent verifiable references, as defined in the link, or they will be deleted. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the him or his company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the he claims or interviewing him. Although you gave many references, correctly formatted and placed in line, most are either interviewing him, quoting what he said or are dubious as independent third-party sources anyway. Incidentally, book refs should give the relevant page number(s).
 * It's actually difficult to see if he actually meets the notability criteria linked above, since so much of the text is self-promotion
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: known for excess and decoration in his creations, gently matching a rigorous composition... developed sense of proportion and architectural shapes... fell in love with fashion... brands and creative minds, those who renewed and recovered its traditional cultural, technical and technological DNA over the past 20 years, rewriting it in a language that is completely original.&mdash; and so on, fact-free opinions and promo.
 * the article was a copyright violation of various sources, including, for example, this. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. The copied sites had no such disclaimer. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial but there is no indication that the copied sites allow free use. Text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.
 * You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. Thank you for declaring your interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that he is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also guidance for editors with conflicts of interest and writing about yourself.
 * Since you work directly or indirectly for the him and are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . Please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.
 * Note that you will not be able to own any article. Anyone can edit any article provided they follow the criteria listed above.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must must make the COI declaration indicated above Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:02, 12 April 2018 (UTC)