User talk:Max Rebo Band

Welcome!
welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions or place   on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. X MarX the Spot (talk) 10:36, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

BDSM-bio-stub
Greetings! I see you have recently created one or more new stub templates or categories. As it states at Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types be proposed prior to creation at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals. This helps to reach consensus about whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WikiProject Stub sorting/Discoveries, where comments are welcome as to any rationale for this stub type. Please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals! Waacstats (talk) 00:08, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

An AfD discussion you might be interested in
Articles for deletion/BoundCon J I P  | Talk 19:16, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Non-penetrative sex
Hi Max,you'll have noticed that the picture you added to the above article hasn't appeared. That's because it's on the list on MediaWiki:Bad image list, if you put a request on the discussion page, it should be soon allowed on that particular article. The name of the list is rather unfortunate, but it's for anything that has been (or is very likely to be) used for vandalism on the Wikipeidia. I generally oppose photographs on sexuality pages, except for illustrating body parts: it's not normally as illustrative of the act as artwork (though I think this picture is an exception). Also it gives the page the look of a porn page: people have good reason to dislike porn as it's usually the exact opposite of sex education and though none of our pages will be work-safe you can read an encyclopedia sex article with a lot less embarrassment than you can view porn. As for the deletion request on the Commons, I may be wrong in this case, but I think a lot of the nudie shots on Flickr were never intended for publication by their subjects. Thanks all the same, for standing up against this horrible censorship drive. --Simon Speed (talk) 00:17, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

PROD
I see you've removed a prod from a page, correctly as the deletion would be far from uncontroversial. I believe you're supposed to add a Deprod yo the talk page of the user who added the prod. --Simon Speed (talk) 00:40, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I honestly never knew that, odd. Thanks for the heads-up, I will do so in the future. Max Rebo Band (talk) 00:42, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Cock and ball torture
Hi Max, I've started a content noticeboard discussion on the illustrations of the CABT article; it's here. -- JN 466  12:20, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Babysitter pornography for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Babysitter pornography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Babysitter pornography until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dysklyver 15:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)