User talk:Maxack37/sandbox

Hey, I just provided feedback on your proposed additions. The link below goes to the page where I placed the feedback. Good Work! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Maxack37/Social_media_and_political_communication_in_the_United_States/Brusso7_Peer_Review Brusso7 (talk) 00:27, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Bradley Russo

Peer Editing by Mervi Tan
I agree with the previous peer reviewer that the tone throughout the article did seem very neutral, which helped make your article seem more reliable. Your sources were not linked or cited through the Wikipedia Cite Function which made it slightly confusing as to which article you were trying to cite. I understand that you tried to have numbers correspond with your bibliography at the end, but try to edit it to use Wikipedia's own Cite Function. However, I did enjoy the multitude of statistics that you had scattered throughout your article, which helped as you were able to back up a lot of your arguments with numbers. I was confused by the P1's and P2's that were scattered throughout your article. Were those supposed to serve as a place marker or what purpose did they have? Otherwise, I felt as though the information was organized well throughout all the headings and were relevant to the article itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Maxack37/Social_media_and_political_communication_in_the_United_States/Mervitan_Peer_Review Mervitan (talk) 23:50, 15 October 2019 (UTC)