User talk:Maxdisco

January 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Israel in the Eurovision Song Contest have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Israel in the Eurovision Song Contest was changed by Maxdisco (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863086 on 2021-01-25T20:06:49+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Israel in the Eurovision Song Contest. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. &horbar;JochemvanHees (talk) 20:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Israel in the Eurovision Song Contest, you may be blocked from editing. There is no point in edit warring. &horbar;JochemvanHees (talk) 20:12, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Israel in the Eurovision Song Contest. Igarnish (talk) 20:13, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. &horbar;JochemvanHees (talk) 20:14, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Israel in the Eurovision Song Contest shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Steve M (talk) 20:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 20:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC)