User talk:Maxen Embry/Archive 1

June 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Leonardo (2011 TV series). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Aspects (talk) 00:43, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

July 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Regé-Jean Page. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. MB 01:57, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Orphaned non-free image File:Disney Channel Groove High Poster.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Disney Channel Groove High Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CBBC Leonardo Poster.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:CBBC Leonardo Poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Rege Jean Page
I found the talk page. Please remove Jonathan Bailey and Phoebe Dynevor from Rege’s wiki page since these actors are not referenced on his page. Please include detail about Rege’s Emmy and SAG nomination. He was also an MTV Breakout star. These awards are listed in the award category. I think it’s strange to only include the NAACP award. An encyclopedia should not be bias. Let’s discuss. Wikitrueupdate (talk) 06:07, 25 July 2022 (UTC)


 * I meant Rege is not mentioned on these actors wiki page. Wikitrueupdate (talk) 06:08, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Rege-Jean Page's wiki page
Hi Maxine. I want to bring to your attention to the following sentences:

In 2022, Page appeared in Netflix's film The Gray Man which received mixed to average reviews. David Ehrlich of IndieWire described Page as "miserable in the role of a gallingly basic villain", with the BBC's Nicholas Barber calling his performance "one-dimensionally evil".

I previously added a cited positive review of his performance, which was deleted and instead an additional negative review was added. I think it is unfair to have only his negative reviews listed on his Wikipedia page. Can I ask why only negative reviews are allowed or why adding a positive review is not constructive? 86.4.187.31 (talk) 18:44, 25 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Please raise this to the article's talk page. Not on mine. Also, this was reverted because you deleted content in the process. Again, go to the article's talk page to resolve this. Maxen Embry (talk) 18:48, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

May 2023
 You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Matty Healy) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:31, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Archiving talk page discussions in order
Hi, I saw that you recently archived a bunch of discussions from Talk:Matty Healy to Talk:Matty Healy/Archive 1. However, when you archived them using OneClickArchiver, it placed the sections in the order you archived them, not the original chronological order. It looks like you started at the bottom and archived them by moving to the top, which meant the archive was reversed. It's not a huge deal and I fixed the archive accordingly in case future editors need to reference it – I just thought it was something you should know when archiving pages in the future. Thanks! RunningTiger123 (talk) 20:27, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:33, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi ,
 * I'm neither questioning your civility, nor whether your contributions have been article improvements, nor whether your talk page discussion was helpful. The latter isn't affected by the block anyway, so do feel free (and encouraged) to continue discussing, please.
 * The accusations of paid editing you have sadly experienced are of course disruptive. I have already removed the "undisclosed paid" tag from the article and warned not to cast aspersions again. If the edit summaries remain a severe concern, you may request revision deletion for them; I personally am not performing revision deletion in this specific case here as I personally have not yet seen a need for it. If you do, please choose one administrator listed at CAT:RFRD for e-mailing and avoid forum shopping in case the response is unsatisfactory.
 * I have not seen a single convincing argument against the partial block yet, though, as edit warring is disruptive even if you are right. I have invited others' feedback about the article content at WP:BLPN, and I think letting others edit the article for two weeks without interference is likely to lead to an improvement.
 * Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:05, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * (PS, the ping above is broken; it has pinged instead of me.) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:06, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the guidance, and thank you for removing the paid tag on the page but shouldn't you also reverted the last edit by Elttaruuu since they're the other party involved and that edition of the page was in contention. Should've retained edit by Aldazuri, a third party. Maxen Embry (talk) 14:16, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
 * This would perhaps have been an option, but I prefer neither revision and tried to avoid (at least indirectly) judging the article's content in this way. The two revisions an administrator can generally safely restore, according to the protection policy (§ Content disputes), are the current revision and a pre-edit-war stable revision. Choosing one that was created in the middle of the edit war is arguably not one of these two options, even if it came from a user whose participation wasn't disruptive enough to justify a block.
 * What makes me really happy though is to see 's edits appearing on the page, perhaps in response to the WP:BLPN notification. This is the type of editing I had hoped for, and – I hope this view doesn't offend – which probably benefits from a lack of interference by or you, at least for the next two weeks.
 * If there are severe policy violations remaining, you may use edit partially-blocked to draw others' quick attention to them on the talk page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The 1975 into Matty Healy. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 12:54, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

A belated notification
Hi, sorry for messaging you again; I'd probably be tired of my notifications at this point. I do not want to annoy you. Sorry.

I am required to notify you that there has been a discussion attempt at WP:COIN about your editing. You should have been notified by, but they didn't notify you as was required. And as their continued accusations are unproductive, I have closed the section and will make sure that such accusations aren't thrown around further. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:50, 18 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you, appreciated! Maxen Embry (talk) 22:57, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Songs written by Matty Healy


A tag has been placed on Category:Songs written by Matty Healy indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 04:21, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Reasons for edit
Hi, Thanks for your work on Matty Healy's page. Would you please use edit summaries? It's confusing for other editors to follow what's happening when you're making lots of edits. Popeye191 (talk) 11:04, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Matty Healy songs
Template:Matty Healy songs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Bilorv ( talk ) 18:24, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Misleading edit summary, unexplained removal of content on Rina Sawayama
You've been here long enough to know that removing a claim is not a copyedit. Please summarize accurately. Why did you remove the claim about John Wick receiving positive reviews when it is pertinent and sourced? This is especially rich coming from a user that wrote on Jonathan Bailey that a production was "acclaimed" when neither of the two cited sources says that. It's been over a year since I asked you to minimize the involvement of your editorial bias. It's unfortunate that I'm having to ask again. KyleJoan talk 02:13, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Hi. Please do not simply revert my improvements to Matty Healy just because you prefer your version of it. A large portion of your recent reverts do not abide WP:NPOV, WP:MOS and WP:V. Please try to take the suggestions and improve your editing habits. Regards.  ℛonherry  ☘  16:28, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Maxen Embry. Thank you for your work on Still... At Their Very Best. User:Skarmory, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Skarmory  (talk •   contribs)  17:58, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Ross MacDonald for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ross MacDonald is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ross MacDonald until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. — Bilorv ( talk ) 19:14, 1 July 2023 (UTC)