User talk:MaxiGordon

Welcome!
Hello, MaxiGordon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:29, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Era 9
You created the ERA 9 article with an articles for creation template in it, so I presume you meant to submit the article for review prior to its publication. To assist that, I have moved the article to the proper Articles for Creation area. You will need to edit the AFC submission template to indicate that the article is ready for review when appropriate. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:29, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of ERA 9 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ERA 9 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ERA 9 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:31, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ERA 9 concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ERA 9, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ERA 9 concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ERA 9, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ERA 9 concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ERA 9, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ERA 9 has been accepted
 ERA 9, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 03:34, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=ERA_9 help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Proposed deletion of ERA 9


The article ERA 9 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable band that fails the WP:GNG and WP:NBAND. Though it looks like here are a number of sources being used, actually looking through them reveals them to be from unreliable (and oftentimes defunct) sources, promotional pieces, trivial mentions, or some combination of the three. Searching for any significant coverage in reliable sources now did not turn up anything."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 16:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of ERA 9 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ERA 9 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ERA 9& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Rorshacma (talk) 16:17, 24 March 2023 (UTC)