User talk:Maxidater

August 2010
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Niels Bohr worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 07:35, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Niels Bohr. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Saddhiyama (talk) 08:02, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ted Dexter, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ted Dexter was changed by Maxidater (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2010-09-28T10:40:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 10:40, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Respiratory failure. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. Stickee (talk)  10:44, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ted meyaard
A tag has been placed on Ted meyaard requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Teapot  george Talk  16:17, 6 October 2010 (UTC)