User talk:Maxikray

Orphaned non-free image File:Mary Louise Weller Hunters.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Mary Louise Weller Hunters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Matthewedwards : Chat  22:12, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Mary Louise Weller Hunters.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mary Louise Weller Hunters.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Mary Louise Weller Reef.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mary Louise Weller Reef.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:52, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mary Louise Weller Hunters.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Mary Louise Weller Hunters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

February 2016
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Donald Wuerl. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 18:37, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

January 2018
Hello, I'm John from Idegon. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Franklin K. Lane High School, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. A much much more reliable source than that will be needed for your edit. John from Idegon (talk) 04:12, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

April 10, 2018
I am removing the poorly sourced reference once again on Bill Champlin's biography about the History of Chicago produced and directed Peter Pardini who is the nephew of Bill Champlin's replacement in the band. This was not truly a documentary but more of an infomercial for the current band. it is also under his tenure with Chicago section and he has not been with the band since 2009. This is here say that has been clearly disputed by others and has no place on wikipedia. thank you. Paulhus15 (talk) 20:25, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Now and Forever (You and Me), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Barbara ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Now_and_Forever_%28You_and_Me%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Now_and_Forever_%28You_and_Me%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Your use of reality shows as sources
For the most part, these programs are only meant as entertainment rather than presenting serious evidence of anything. Autopsy: The Last Hours of..., especially, cannot be counted on as a reliable source as the show's main ME has never seen any of the subjects, nor examined them in person or had their causes of death made public as part of a governmental record. If I see any further additions of 'sources' involving this program, they will be removed.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 21:02, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Once again, I emphasize if a program is meant more as entertainment than informative, it cannot be used as a source. AMW certainly can be used as a source because they use law enforcement sources, along with quite a few shows on ID and indeed, Unsolved Mysteries; as long as a subject close to a case is on those shows, we aren't generally going to object to that source. However, shows where a third party with nothing to do with the case and just speculating about a cause of death or the state of a criminal's mind certainly cannot be used, and you certainly cannot utilize a YouTube video as a source.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 20:08, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Newscasts are often connected to stories online; we prefer sources we can read. Again, read WP:RELIABLE for what is and isn't acceptable, and please stop spamming my talk page.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 02:39, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Reliable sources
Thanks for contributing to the article Toy Story 2. However, do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Thanks! P.S. If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Please read WP:YOUTUBE in addition. You've persisted on including badly-sourced information for so long, but it stops now.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 02:46, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

National varieties of English
Hello. In a recent edit to the page Damsel in distress, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. ''Hi. I am not sure what your intent was here but it wasn't clear to me that the article was originally or should be in AmE. Was there a specific reason for your changes outside WP:ENGVAR, please? Thanks'' DBaK (talk) 00:10, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

New message from DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:The Golden Compass (film) § Which English?. &#x0020;I may have screwed up in reverting your ize/ise changes here so I reverted myself – please have a look. Thanks! DBaK (talk) 12:27, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Please use edit summaries that are actually relevant to the edit you are performing."#suggestededit-add 1.0" is not at all correct when what you've actually done is add a short description. XAM2175 (T) 11:39, 17 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Well, can you please give me an example of what I should be doing instead of what I've done? Maxikray (talk) 19:27, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I didn't think I'd have to be so obvious. If you're adding a short description to an article, a good edit summary to use would be "added short description". If you were feeling especially helpful, you might even put the new short description into the edit summary, as in; "added short description: article about x". XAM2175  (T) 12:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * You have to excuse me, XAM2175. I used the Android mobile app for Wikipedia to provide an "article description" for the Wikipedia article about DRG Class ET 169.  I was alerted to the article by the "Suggested edits" stuff.  By providing an "article description," I wasn't officially given an option to provide an edit summary. Maxikray (talk) 19:22, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see. I wasn't aware that that feature functioned that way. Thank you. XAM2175  (T) 20:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)