User talk:Maximus Rex

Welcome to Maximus Rex's Talk Page

Nomination of Uber (company) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uber (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Uber (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 23:59, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Notice of change
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

(delivered by mabdul 23:36, 3 December 2012 (UTC))

Cleaned to place up a bit
I have cleaned the place up a bit to make it look more presentable and to get rid of stuff which is no longer a concern any more but you can all ways change it back if you want.  User: H.Brian Griffin talk 16:50, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Brakteat bischof ulrich von halberstadt und albrecht der baer.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Brakteat bischof ulrich von halberstadt und albrecht der baer.jpg

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 04:52, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Freak for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Freak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Freak until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Brakteat bischof ulrich von halberstadt und albrecht der baer.jpg


The file File:Brakteat bischof ulrich von halberstadt und albrecht der baer.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused file, unsuitable for Commons"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – User 45  65  41  16:51, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

"Thermochromic Paint" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Thermochromic Paint and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 18 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

"Duragesic®" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Duragesic® and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 04:45, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

"Melbourne, Australia." listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Melbourne,_Australia.&redirect=no Melbourne, Australia.] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 07:11, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Naropa (disambiguation)


The article Naropa (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Invalid and unnecessary disambiguation page containing the primary topic and only one other topic."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

ITN archives
Hi. I hope you are doing well. I am glad to tell you that In the news/Posted/Archives are now fully available, with all the vandalism/disruptive edits removed. While creating the bot for the archival process, I went through a lot of the older posts, you are one of the editors whose name popped quite often in ITN in "back in the day", so I personally wanted to let you know about the archives I hope you see this message someday. —usernamekiran (talk) 22:05, 18 July 2024 (UTC)