User talk:Maxis ftw

Richboyliang
i'm deleting the stuff on vundo because some idiot always deletes my section on removing virtumonde and i dont know who, and no one bothered him about that so i wonder why all my GOOD edits are being removed like the section i added several months ago! Richboyliang (talk) 01:39, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Confirmation of access request for ACC
This is my confirmation that I requested access to the Account Creator module. Thank you. Maxis ftw (talk) 05:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! II MusLiM HyBRiD II 23:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Hi Maxis, ftw. I was just wondering why my contribution to the Seventh Day Adventist page was "unconstructive". Are you Seventh Day Adventist? If so, then you must acknowledge the truth in my article contribution. This phenomena of hypocrisy when it comes to modesty of self adornment and material possession is a fact. You should try living in Loma Linda, California to understand this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.151.25.115 (talk) 00:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Alright, I wouldn't worry too much. Mistakes happen. I've removed the warning from your talk page, since you've made it clear it was an accidental revert to a previous bad version. You've accidently restored bad content, but thanks for putting the effort in and giving it a go :) If you'd like to learn more about reverting vandalism, see WP:REVERT and WP:VANDALISM, which have some useful tips. Happy editing. SMC (talk) 23:10, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * You're doing a pretty good job yourself just using the basic undo function. Can I suggest, though, that you warn vandals when they vandalise? This helps the community deal with longer term vandalism by recording an official warning on their talk pages, which, if they record four warnings and then vandalise after their final warning (all within a short period of time, say, a day), will usually result in a block. If you can take that suggestion on it might even make things a little easier on you, since a warned user may think twice about vandalising again. Having said that, you're doing an awesome job with many accurate reverts that I can see. Keep it up! Cheers. SMC (talk) 23:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Will do. I'll start warning them with the templates you linked to for me. Cheers!Maxis ftw (talk) 23:47, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Just another note about warnings, usually they'll go up in levels - so for the first time the user vandalises, the warning is a uw-vandalism1, second time is a uw-vandalism2, and so on. After vandalism4, if the vandalism still continues you can report the user at WP:AIV. Thanks :) SMC (talk) 00:20, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much for telling me! Maxis ftw (talk) 00:42, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Homosexual has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. SunDragon34 (talk) 08:18, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh, no-no-no-no. Sorry about that.  You did the right thing, for sure!  I just hit the revert button on Huggle at the same time you hit undo, and so I ended up accidentally reverting you instead of the vandal.  You definitely did the right thing; that was a vandal you reverted--Our reverts simply fell at the same time, and my revert command hit you instead.  I reverted myself; see my edit summary on the page history following my accidental undo.  Sorry about the mix-up.  Cheers!  SunDragon34 (talk) 08:30, 3 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Cool, thank you for your understanding. Cheers!Maxis ftw (talk) 08:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Hehe, I made a similar mistake (misinterpreting the history page), except I blocked you indefinitely instead of just reverting. Should be back to normal now. &mdash; Werdna  &bull;  talk  11:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

hey what was wrong with my statement??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.103.39.21 (talk) 08:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * You wrote, "you guys should shut the fuck up!!!! fuckin nerds and your bullshit!!" []. That's a personal attack and it's vandalism. Maxis ftw (talk) 08:26, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Your rollback request
Hello Maxis ftw, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Please remember that rollback should be used in order to revert vandalism/spam, and that misuse of the tool, either by revert-warring with others users, or simply by reverting edits that you disagree with, can lead to its removal. For practice, you may wish to see New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 23:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much. I'll read up on the Rollback guide! Thank you Acalamari. Maxis ftw (talk) 23:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! Acalamari 23:52, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

hey
I was about as constructive as your mom all i want to do is make a wiki page about me becuz i wanna type my name in and look at it but i cant so ima take it out on wikipedia
 * BTW, you just said "I was about as constructive as your mom...". That's a personal insult, and its vandalism. And your edits, 1, 2 are not constructive, it is vandalism. Maxis ftw (talk) 02:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I am sorry that you feel so, angered, by my acctions. I meant nothing to offend. I didn't understant what you meant. 02:49, 1 November 2008 (UTC)jakerstien —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakerstien (talk • contribs)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. Much appreciated. Keep up the good work on vandals. -- Jackelfive (talk)
 * Hey anytime, anytime. Happy Halloween to ya! Maxis ftw (talk) 03:15, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...
...for reverting the vandalism on my page. It is much appreciated! Cheers! – Ms. Sarita  Confer  10:39, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Anytime, Ms. Sarita. Maxis ftw (talk) 18:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Just Curious
As a relative newcomer to Wikipedia, I was curious about what you found unconstructive about my (admittedly minor) edit to The Tale of the Bunny Picnic. As I recall, it was to correct a spelling error for which I did provide an edit summary. Any information you could give me to clarify would be helpful as I continue to edit on Wikipedia. Thanks! JimVC3 (talk) 19:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey sorry about that. I tried to revert my own edit. I was using an automated editing program called Huggle and I accidently reverted yours by mistake. I reverted my own edit back to yours. Sorry for the trouble! As for the warning I striked through above, it's an automated message. Maxis ftw (talk) 19:31, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikithanks!
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my page.

In other words, Lay off the huggling, and leave some for me! :D &mdash; La Pianista  (T•C•S) 20:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC)  La Pianista  (T•C•S) 20:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * :), no problem! Cheers! Maxis ftw (talk) 20:08, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey
Its All In A days Work. /\ _ /\  II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ  21:51, 1 November 2008 (UTC)


 * I just noticed that I was the one who welcomed you. O_O Lol. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ  00:11, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Hoorah! Youre really teh first one who I welcomed that is pretty much active. All the others i welcomed hardly care. Lol, Indeed time does pass fast. Well not always for me. I joined in June, and I feel like that im still in August. O.o And also its pretty random how IPs and new users come up and asking questions like "your only 13, and you edit wikipedia". For some reason, I dont know whats wrong with editing wiki. Lol, anyways. Cheers! II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ  00:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

sorry
I thought you were vandlizing because of that weird sig you did. Um could you retype that message again your sig doesn't seem to working on lapianista's userpage.-- Spittle spat  22:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Sure, Maxis ftw (talk) 22:59, 1 November 2008 (UTC).

Thanks
Thanks for the revert on my userpage, I hadn't even noticed! He now thinks i'm a bot lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bremerenator (talk • contribs) 23:48, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Man that guy is funny. I'll be on the look out for more problems from this guy. Cheers Maxis ftw (talk) 23:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

a shiny

 * You have utterly no idea how tempted I am to escalate the one-up-man-ship of barnstar giving..... Thanks! And if you're getting comments like that, you must really be doing something right, so good job! J.delanoy gabs adds  02:11, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

No problem
Anything I can do to make this place a bit more friendly. Wysprgr2005 (talk) 02:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for that...
I'd give you a barnstar, but I don't know how...

So thanks again! Wysprgr2005 (talk) 02:55, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

You're so fast!
How do you do it? I had to remove my AVI notice here because you beat me to it.  Digital Ninja  03:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reply! I already have rollback, so I'll get Huggle!!!  YAY!!!  Cheers,  Digital Ninja  03:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * And Huggle FTW!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by DigitalNinja (talk • contribs) 03:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Your talk page...
... is protected for 9 hours. That guy will have to find someone else to bug. Probably me, but oh well.... J.delanoy gabs adds 03:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Whoo boy! I'll be on the look out for him on your page, don't worry. Thank you again! Maxis ftw (talk) 03:25, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

accusation of Vandalism against Modernism
I am new to Wikipedia. Please can you look at the discussion page for western painting, and my talk page, and explain to me why it is vandalism to suggest to Modernism that he should refrain from making unsourced assertions. I assure you that it was meant as friendly advice. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Research Method (talk • contribs) 03:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that Research Method, I reverted my reversion on your edit for the article. I was trying to revert another article through Huggle, but I accidently reverted your edits. Sorry again. Here, I reverted it back to what you originally wrote. Maxis ftw (talk) 04:01, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your swift retraction! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Research Method (talk • contribs) 03:53, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

ACC Tool
Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and/or the mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for your participating in the account creation process. -  ·Add§hore·  T alk /C ont 12:29, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

71.173.156.167
Dear Maxis, I would like to apologize for me stupid behavior.

I would like to tell you that this was just an impulse of my way i feel about presidential candidate Barack Obama.

Steven Renzelt York,PA

Sdthird10
hi sorry for the disturbance

my friends doing it he got my password

Tw3435 is really a spammer
Here is what thing he do:
 * 1) Post clocks into User talk pages
 * 2) Lying in the talk pages
 * 3) Add silly things in pages --125.25.17.39 (talk) 08:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Thx
Thank you very much for watching my talk page today. That's very appreciated and I apologize for the mess :/ -- lucasbfr  talk 09:52, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure the users are unrelated (the attack is coordinated though). WP:RBI all the way here :). -- lucasbfr  talk 10:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry Man
FOR THE TROUBLE IVE BEEN CAUSING. IM STILL A BEGINNER. I didnt know you can use a sandbox for test editing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Youlittlehandsomeguy (talk • contribs) 11:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Np
Lol, its cool. [[User:II MusLiM HyBRiD II|I4m 733t0rz  02:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Btw This might keep happening, but I dont think wraning is necessary, but go ahead. These IPs are being used abuseivelly by User:Grawp and Hagger. This happens all teh time, by different users/ IPs. Just pointing it out. G ! B B i 3 I4m 733t0rz  02:28, 8 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Lol, Np. This users talk page was redirected several times, but by different IPs. :/ G ! B B i 3 I4m 733t0rz  02:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh, one more thing. This belongs to you. :P G ! B B i 3 I4m 733t0rz 02:34, 8 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Well. Heres soem info on them.

Names In Harry Potter, there was Hagrid, and Grawp. Grawp, being Grawp, the mean vandal. And Hagrid Being Hagger. So yeah.


 * This is an example of what Hagger does]


 * Grawps Chechuser He got perm. banned, but still comes back with accounts that are related to his name, attacks aginst other editors, etc. He always has something against anyone.


 * Again, this is we're they made a page about him on encyclopedia dramatica. What ever you do, do not and encourage you do not view his userpage, it shows a computer-crashing image.


 * Same thing with Hagger They say that hes Grawps "older/twin brother". People like them are, obviously, Trolls.


 * More info of them can be found on encyclopedia dramtica. Just one thing. If you ever go there, try not to see Grawps and Haggers user page... It has a computer crashing image.


 * Btw, there are more vandals to be on the look out for.

User:Willy on wheels was a user who actually succesfully moved This to placing the globe with Willy On Wheels. He is banned as well, but trolling always comes back.


 * One more i think. She was known as The Avril Troll.

She is a fanatic of [Avril Lavigne]. She trolls the ref desk and their headers and many articles and users. She did some Trolls in May here and here. Brought up [#Vandalism on Gregory Peck? here]. She basically used Tor Nodes to do all this. Hundreds of accounts. Her epic vandalism is here from one of her accounts. Her mess on one article. Her on a talk page which basically tells the whole story. And [http://jpoa.info/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/wikicatlav.png another annoying edit. The link below was computer crashing as well.] Btw, she crashed encyclopedia dramatica for half an hour. So yeah. But she gave up Here, and said that she had fun while it lasted.


 * Anyways, Im done lecturing. I hope you know a little bit more now. Right? ^^


 * Im gonna go and head of to get some sleep, Its 10pm here. Good night, Lol. Take care Maxis! ^^  G ! B B i 3 <sup style="font-size: 9pt;color:#169">I4m 733t0rz  03:01, 8 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh and thanks for the barnstar. Cheers!

207.177.48.61 vandal
Hello, further to your previous fnal warning of this user/s they are continuing to vandalise (see ). If you are an admin would you please be so kind as to do the needful? Many thanks SeventhHell (talk) 04:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
--Hazel77 talk 14:34, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Speedy work - you beat me to the punch on both reverting the vandalism on my talk page, and AIV :-) CultureDrone (talk) 12:43, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey
Sorry, but Im retiring. I hope this doesn’t affect you in anyway, but take care of your self, and best wishes. I hope you learned a few things from my long lecture. ;)  M.H. <sup style="font-size: 9pt;color:#169">ITrue Romace iS Dead  00:57, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:orange; border-width:20px; text-align:left; padding:20px;" class="plainlinks">

''' M.H. <sup style="font-size: 9pt;color:#169">ITrue Romace iS Dead is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This card promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has has made your day a much better. Best Wishes and Happy Editing.

15:53, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:Blue; background-color:White; border-width:30px; text-align:left; padding:30px;" class="plainlinks">

''' Galib is wishing you a Happy New Year. This card promotes WikiLove and hopefully it has made your day much better. Best Wishes and Happy Editing! Best To Reply At My Talk Page. Thanks.


 * Just Stopping by. Yours Truly, M.H. <sup style="font-size: 9pt;color:#169">True Romance iS Dead  14:52, 1 January 2009 (UTC) 718smiley.png.

Protip
Just a protip, on Atlantis Band the article you reverted just recently, the user who blanked the page was the original author, so instead of reverting, you can tag for csd-g7 Q  T C 22:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
For the revert on Gladiator - I hadn't even noticed the damage until I checked the history. You really are quick off the mark! Regards. Haploidavey (talk) 19:54, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Glad to help! Maxis ftw (talk) 19:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks Re: 64.198.83.49 vandalism to Khlyst article.
Thanks Maxis. The vandalism is absurd to the point of bordering on a minor form of psychopathology! No doubt a phenomenon well coped with in Wikipedia - it is interesting to note those who indulge in 'cyber-vandalism' but also those such as your good self, who go to the trouble to monitor these creatures.Ernstblumberg (talk) 06:27, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism
Can you show how my edits are vandalism more clearly than the template does and show how the edits would not be vandalism but rather simple additions and edits? -- Dr CyCoe (talk) 02:58, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Thumb sucking
I noticed you reverted a user 124.171.45.228 for edits she wrote on thumb sucking. She's not actually a vandal so much as a long standing content disputer, Elsiemobbs, who has been editing the article off and on for about 2 years. Back in 2007 she seemed easy to talk to, but lately she is getting more difficult because she has moved towards a strategy of posting content that supports her particular theory about mammalian imprinting with a reference pointing to a paper-only source which so far has invariably turned out not to contain the information she claims it has. For somebody with access to a library that has these journals or has an ILL program, that would not be such a problem, but I'm not that lucky. I am going to have to devolve the responsibility for watching her onto somebody else as there is not much else I can do. <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 02:01, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The problem I have is that even though I'm almost sure (from past experience) that her source doesn't say what she claims it does, there's no way I can prove it without actually going out and looking up the information in whichever article she is referring to.  And then I'm sure she'll just do the same thing again.  I don't think she has any purpose here on Wikipedia other than to promote her theories ... whether there is a monetary incentive behind that (she's published a book), or whether she's just promoting her point of view because she believes it's correct and wants people to hear it, it's pretty much the only thing she's done in all her time on Wikipedia.  I would not have a problem with this, and would be happy to fix up her edits so that they are properly formatted, easy to read, and so on, (and in fact I have done that with her edits in the past), if they were actually verifiable.  But this is not the case.  She is essentially a POV editor hiding behind paper sources which I don't have easy access to and it seems that nobody else is paying any attention to the article.    What would you recommend I do?   <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 02:16, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

My original MA Thesis now 20 years old gave references and I usually speak at about 3 conferences a year. This year I am presenting at the Biological Psychiatry conference in Paris 28/6/09-2/7/09. If there is any doubt about my work and you want a printout or a specific reference you can write to me directly Dr Elsie Mobbs, Perinatal & Infant Mental Health Service, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool 2170, NSW, Australia and my mobile is 0417203439. Steven Suomi who is now head of Harry Harlow's institute said in public at a conference that thumbsucking in primates is indicative of the animal being raised by humans. If you buy my book there is a photo of a thumbsucking human reared kangaroo. In one of Konrad Lorenz's publication you will find his dummy sucking beaver photo! Look up Utube and you will find many videos of human reared body part sucking animals. Elsie Mobbs —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.174.5 (talk) 04:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Good catch!
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page; I'm much obliged!  Sophus Bie  (talk) 02:55, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem sophus bie !Maxis ftw (talk) 03:01, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 01:14, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
for the tp revert :) Tommy!  [ message ] 00:48, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * NP! Maxis ftw (talk) 19:08, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Sorry (65.51.78.162)
Regarding that Chang edit, sorry, this is a large office, and someone thought they were being funny. :O(

65.51.78.162 (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)