User talk:MaxnaCarta/Archive 7

The Samantha murphy case
I have been watching closely this whole case unfold and while doing so I have noticed that there is one particular community member that seems to have a vendetta against a group I’ve seen online that has been assisting with the searches. I don’t know these people however I have read articles on the work that ‘ground crew’ has been doing. I’ve noticed over the past few weeks that in the response section for searches that it’s been heavily noted that the group searching was the find Samantha group however this is false. That was a discussion and speculation group and the owner of that never conducted searches this particular community member has also been causing trouble online from what I’ve read and I do not believe she should be mentioned in such a sensitive case. Just my opinion as an onlooker. PivotTruth (talk) 00:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Also to my knowledge the PMAV also helped with the searches. Prospectors and mining association of Victoria PivotTruth (talk) 00:50, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Not necessary to include. Thanks — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @PivotTruth What is written is accurate and substantiated by a source. I will not become involved in the scuttlebut and brawling that occured. We only include what is reported in a secondary sourcing. The arguments in Ballarat over the different groups and their names and activity are not relevant to an encylopaedia. The paragraph is highlighting community interest and response, it does not give credit to any particular person for conducting searches. Thanks. — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 00:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I’m just trying to include the information to be factual of which it is not currently https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/crime/volunteer-ground-crew-continue-to-help-victoria-police-in-search-for-samantha-murphys-body/news-story/eb825eb20563ff4a902d40a2b1d1933d?amp here is an article to show the facts. PivotTruth (talk) 01:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Clean (2022 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Clean (2022 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Otuọcha -- Otuọcha (talk) 23:04, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Disappearance of Samantha Murphy
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Disappearance of Samantha Murphy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tamzin -- Tamzin (talk) 23:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
Hello ,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Clean (2022 film)
Hello! Your submission of Clean (2022 film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)