User talk:Maxpeiron

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mural of Sant Víctor de Saurí (April 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chaotic Enby was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mural of Sant Víctor de Saurí and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Mural_of_Sant_V%C3%ADctor_de_Saur%C3%AD Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chaotic_Enby&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mural_of_Sant_V%C3%ADctor_de_Saur%C3%AD reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chaotıċ Enby  (talk · contribs) 14:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I have some questions about the reasoning for the rejection of my article. I feel like the sources I use are not just passing matters of the subject. They are articles or pages that talk explicitly about the mural in the church. Additionally, I am confused as to why they wouldn't be considered reliable sources.
 * You also made a comment on the sources not being independent of the subject, but reject the use of the scholarly articles because they are independent of the subject.
 * I would be very appreciative of your clarification. Maxpeiron (talk) 17:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I did not reject the scholarly articles because they are independent, but because they don't talk about the subject. Ideally, we'd want sources that talk about the subject, but are independent of it, so their presentation of it would be neutral. A source that is connected to the subject (not independent) has an incentive in showcasing it in a particular way (e.g. promotion, subjective view, etc.), and is thus not considered reliable for this purpose. Chaotıċ Enby   (talk · contribs) 17:58, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Role Exchange (artwork) has been accepted
 Role Exchange (artwork), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Role_Exchange_(artwork) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Stuartyeates (talk) 05:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)