User talk:Maxpower03

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Anna Lincoln (talk) 17:26, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

What?
I'm sorry, but how are referencing episodes that have not aired (a year from now), unnecessary? A general mess? How? Please explain. -- Mike Allen talk · contribs 03:01, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

A link to some kind of source is fine, but IMDb isn't reliable. Can't we just have one link to SpoilerTV or something (if a source is even necessary, since it's all out there online anyway if you actually want proof, just search each episode title or whatever), since linking to IMDb has no real purpose as it's just as user-updated as Wikipedia itself is. "Guest stars should not be listed above the season, if they are already listed below." They weren't listed both above the season as well as below, I was removing them one at a time when they actually appeared in an episode. "Kathy Griffin? Where's the source to that?" She's said as much in an interview, which was linked to on SpoilerTV. I removed the "general mess" as it was extremely messy. The whole point of guest stars listed at the top of the season were that they were notable, like Famke Janssen returning, or Vanessa Redgrave etc. It wasn't just a list of any old guest star that's appearing on the show, so I didn't understand why you're adding people like "Michelle Pascarella as Valerie" (who?). Coupled with that was all the spelling mistakes (guest STARING?), the many Wiki mistakes (like the three [[[ for links) and all the unnecessary TBAs, which should just be implied by the blank space. There's no need to fill every blank space up with it.

Either way, I’ve added one source for the episode titles (adding a ref point after every episode title just makes the list look messy, agree?), removed the guest stars (since I have no interest in debating that). The list looks fine, I think we've reached a happy medium in terms of your view and my view. End of discussion, hopefully? Maxpower03 8:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Then why is it OK to copy actor's credits from IMDb. Of course some of the stats aren't reliable, but that doesn't mean it's completely false.  "Members" not only update IMDb, but the people behind the film or TV show also update it (IMDb Pro).  Anyways that's fair enough.  Well if Kathy Griffin "supplied" an interview, then why don't you supply that source?  General mess?  A few mistakes is a "complete mess"?  I attempted to have have a rational conversation with you about my "general MESS", but you are have to be rude about it and act like I'm some anonymous vandalizing idiot that did this on purpose and doesn't care that I may have made a mistake.  Well I hate it for ya, but if you revert my "MESS" then I am surely coming to your talk page, not to debate, but to talk about it.  I'm sorry you hate that concept, but that's what Wikipedia is about -- calibrating -- not working against each other.   -- Mike Allen talk · contribs 18:08, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not being rude to you, and I don't think you're "some anonymous vandalizing idiot". There was just a lot of mess created by your update, including a bunch of general mistakes. I don't understand why somebody would update so much information and not at least check after to see if it looks presentable. "Calibrating"? Uh... do you mean "collaborating"? If that is in fact what you mean, then, yeah, of course. I appear to have hit a nerve with you, and I apologize if you feel as if I'm antagonizing you or something. Maxpower03 14:09, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, and I'm just basing this on your updates in question and on this very talk page, you seem to make a lot of spelling mistakes and grammatical errors in your writing, so don't get offended or angry when somebody calls you out on it. Some of your writing is hard to understand, and the meaning you're trying to put across just can't be made out. Maxpower03 14:17, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Dan Daly
Where is the synopsis for the Nip/Tuck episode "Dan Daly" located? -- Mike Allen talk · contribs 18:42, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Maxpower03 14:27, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Hmm so FX is calling this season 7. Well how about that. -- Mike Allen talk · contribs 22:46, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Final episode title for Nip/Tuck
Do you know where any sources are calling the last episode of "A Perfect Lie"? The IP is citing a forum, so that's inadmissible. Looks like I'm going to have to report them to 3RR or request page protection. — Mike   Allen   00:02, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Are you serious? That's ridiculous. Do you have any idea how this is gonna end up? When the article will re-open or whatever? Understandable though, the guy's an obvious troll. There's been speculation that the finale's called "Ava Moore" (which makes sense) but it hasn't been confirmed anywhere. I haven't heard anywhere that it's called "A Perfect Lie" though. That doesn't even make sense taking into account what every other episode is named after. I searched the forum on the FX site and nothing's there either. Maxpower03 13:18, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Ah, don't worry, just realized it's not completely locked. Maxpower03 13:28, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Liz Cruz (Nip/Tuck) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liz Cruz (Nip/Tuck), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Liz Cruz (Nip/Tuck) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Julia McNamara for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julia McNamara, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Julia McNamara until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Matt McNamara for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt McNamara, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Matt McNamara until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Kimber Henry for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kimber Henry, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Kimber Henry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)