User talk:Maxrobbins

Speedy deletion of Aicache
A tag has been placed on Aicache, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you.  TN ‑  X   - Man  14:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Why was this removed when this page has links to nearly 20 products with similar descriptions? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_server#Proxy_software

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page.  TN ‑  X   - Man  14:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Leujohn ( talk ) 14:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 11:53, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Aicache
A tag has been placed on Aicache, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Aicache and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eeekster (talk) 11:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Eeekster (talk) 11:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Aicache
A tag has been placed on Aicache, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. MrOllie (talk) 13:50, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Content copied from Talk:Aicache
I would like to kindly know how you decide what is and is not useful data.

This technology is of great interest to a large number of developers. If you take the time to google you will see that the Epoll mechanism for caching it is widely used in the industry and of interest. I am frankly quite tired of the protection of other competitive content by summarily dismissing this entry.

This entry ONLY explains the technical detail of a very important portion of the Linux operating system and its relation to Caching. Where there are nearly 200 other caching PRODUCTS listed on Wikipedia that are completely commercial advertisements this entry limits itself to the requisite technical definitions.

In five instances now there has been a removal of this content without so much as a single line of explanation in the talk file.

So please please please act in accordance to the Wikipedia guidelines and investigate the links, history, and google references and provide a simple justification for your actions so we may have a discussion upon which the community may benefit.
 * While the AICache technology may certainly be useful, this article is written like an advertisement for it, not an encyclopedic article. Check out WP:MOS and WP:POV and those should give you an idea of how you can improve the article.  One other thing I'm curious about is whether this subject is even deserving of an entire article, or if it just needs a blurb in another article. Phuzion (talk) 20:36, 28 January 2009 (UTC)