User talk:Maxwell33

Frank Sander Residence
Could you please provide a verifiable source in support of the tragic story of Mr & Mr Sander? --Waltloc (talk) 15:33, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi hi. I am wondering why the beautiful page I created on this historic house keeps being changed? I put a lot of effort and thought into it and it does not violate your policy. I throughly researched the house and submitted an entire report for my Art class at Westhill. It is the only Lloyd Wright house in our city and legend has it is haunted. Hence the suicides. I found much of the information from the FL Wright Foundation and also from my local library and the City of Stamford Assessors Office. There is no negative tone. The history is part of the house. I will put it back the way I had it. M.M.


 * I replied on the talk page for the article. In short, Wikipedia has very different standards than a research paper. You have done some great work but, odd as it sounds at first, Wikipedia is not the place to publish your findings. I provided some policy information in my other comment, but check out WP:NOR. Thanks! Savewright (talk) 04:21, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't understand who you, "Savewright" are? Who is "Waltloc?" I am changing the article back ot the way I had it. I also gave you specific sources of the sucides.


 * Please do not revert the article again as it may be considered disruptive or vandalism. Your changes contain numerous opinions with no supporting citations. You have overwritten other changes by other editors as well, including the removal of a dead promotional link not cited by the article. You also changed structural details of the house, removing a cited source (NY Times), without discussion. On the discussion page you have shown bias toward the subject, which isn't helpful. You also deleted a previous attempt to talk with you on this page. If you can provide independent, published references for your claims please provide them on the page. Otherwise, Wikipedia is not a place to publish original research WP:NOR. If you have questions on these policies you can ask for help on the noticeboards. Thank you. Savewright (talk) 06:13, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * As an example, I've included a portion of the article below showing phrases that would need individual citations in order to remain in Wikipedia. Unless you have references for these claims, please do not re-introduce the information into the article. Again, we're not doubting your information or saying the research is bad. We just cannot include it without attribution to a trusted, published source:


 * Of all the information above, the only information I could find references for was the 2.3 acres and cantilever, unfortunately from a Geocities site. I added that reference and you've removed it nine times. In addition, much of the other information is out of place in Wikipedia because it either involves non-notable individuals and/or living persons and doesn't directly relate to the topic. Finally, the tone is wrong in many of these sentences (see WP:NPOV) and there are even typos. Again, by example, "The Sanders requested alterations to the design in the working drawing stage, including the addition of an enclosed balcony." While this solves the tone problem, it still needs a published reference for inclusion. Phrases such as "One of the biggest misconceptions..." also raise flags. If there is a big controversy, it should be easy to find published information. Again, I could find nothing. Feel free to add information relating to the structure back to the article, but please do it on a sentence-by-sentence basis and provide references. Savewright (talk) 18:56, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 05:12, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

1) You fail to identify who you are? 2) I will be removing the photo that I contributed. Your web page sucks if this is the way you treat contributor. 3) the NYT article is WRONG on the structural details you speak about. City of Stamford has the correct sft at the number I listed. 4) It is impossisble how to figure out how to use your website to make changes and signatures. I am a novice and don't have time to learn to do all this. How do you expenct contributions.

I will never contribute to you website again - ASSHOLE!

GO FUCK YOURSELF!!!!!!!!

January 2009
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.