User talk:Maxxbeach

Proposed deletion of UrbanTone Records


The article UrbanTone Records has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Lacks reliable sources to establish notability of an organization.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. tedder (talk) 03:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Tomorrows bad seeds for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tomorrows bad seeds is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tomorrows bad seeds until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. tedder (talk) 04:03, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Tomorrows bad seeds. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. tedder (talk) 00:08, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Tomorrows bad seeds. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. tedder (talk) 23:24, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Tomorrows bad seeds
Follow this link to discuss notability do not remove the tag from the pageRyan Vesey (talk) 19:28, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Tomorrows bad seeds, you may be blocked from editing. tedder (talk) 18:34, 21 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Even if you strongly disagree when someone labels an article for deletion, removing the AFD template from the article is completely inappropriate and if you continue to do so, you may be banned. It is better to go to the discussion (linked in the template) to discuss why you think the article should be kept, following the advice from WP:AFD. --M ASEM (t) 20:44, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of UrbanTone Records for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UrbanTone Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/UrbanTone Records & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SarahStierch (talk) 06:49, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of UrbanTone Records


A tag has been placed on UrbanTone Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://urbantonerecords.com/about1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 78.26  (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 16:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)