User talk:MayaIniguez/New sandbox

Justin's Peer Review
In terms of feedback, I would say it feels like there is a lack of a lead section and as a result, it seems like there is a lack of structure. Try to make a lead section that clearly outlines where the rest of the article is going. Additionally, there are some minor typing errors like no space between separate words and and sentences that sound awkward.

However, I did find the sources very good and the article itself was interesting and engaging. If the above problems can be fixed the article is on the right track. Also, expanding on the topic would go a long way, though since this is still an early draft that is likely to happen.

Doug's Peer Review
Overall, this is a good start. I would make the lead section just a few lines and then break the rest up into subsections like history, legality, economics, etc. Also, make sure to format those hyperlinks in the text so that there is a space between the link and the next word, because right now the sebsi, Sufi, and Majoun links jam into the next word. Njgoldenbear (talk) 02:56, 7 April 2019 (UTC)