User talk:Mayadog1

Welcome!
Hi Mayadog1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 01:36, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

June 2023
Hello, I'm Actualcpscm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Inez Dickens—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:28, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Also. Respectfully how is it not constructive? It’s not relevant or important that a well known politician lied about her education? Wiki isn’t only for positive information. Editors are supposed to fair and unbiased. It’s negative information but it’s most certainly constructive no? Mayadog1 (talk) 21:30, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Inez Dickens. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:36, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * It was referenced. I cited the NY post Mayadog1 (talk) 21:30, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Inez Dickens. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:48, 11 June 2023 (UTC)  You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 12:21, 11 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Wait a sec. This wasn’t an ad hominem attack. It’s literally info that’s in the news all week and I cited the NY Post. In fact someone else removed Howard University from the main section of her biography and that was allowed to stand. I can certainly link articles to the information but this was not slanderous or personal. It’s news Mayadog1 (talk) 21:27, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * This feels like I’m being punished for a unflattering but completely truthful entry Mayadog1 (talk) 21:31, 11 June 2023 (UTC)