User talk:Maylejoma

Welcome!
Hello, Maylejoma, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Rachael Marie Collins, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Trivialist (talk) 22:05, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Rachael Marie Collins


A tag has been placed on Rachael Marie Collins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Trivialist (talk) 22:05, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyright
Hi Maylejoma. Wikipedia cannot use copyrighted content by permission for one time use, but requires that content here be licensed under a suitably unrestrictive free copyright license (or public domain release). This means that the owner has to irrevocably release the content to the world under such a license, so that our readers can take the content and use it themselves under  (even for commercial purposes). And any such specific release would have to be done in a verifiable way – not through an edit summary from an anonymous person asserting they have ownership. Some detail can be found at Donating copyrighted materials. See also Declaration of consent for all enquiries. But this may be putting the cart before the horse, because in the first place this reads much more like a résumé and less like a Wikipedia article than it should.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:25, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
 * You can ignore this. Because you reposted the content after it was deleted at Articles for deletion/Rachael Marie Collins, I was not aware a verifiable release had been received through the OTRS system, so it was not a copyvio. However, it has been restored to note my mistake and then been deleted as a repost of content deleted by consensus after an articles for deletion discussion, under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:56, 10 March 2015 (UTC)