User talk:Mayrelfrancom

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flor Garduño has been accepted
 Flor Garduño, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Flor_Gardu%C3%B1o help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the article on Garduno! We appreciate your contribution. In the hopes that you stick around, I wanted to give you some advice about writing for Wikipedia that can be different from your usual writing about art. It would be great if you could add one citation per sentence in the article; that is ideal, especially for biographies of living people. Also, a lot of the article content was opinions that were not attributed and were written in Wikipedia's voice. In an encyclopedia, it's better to write things like "Jane Doe has written that Betty Photographer draws on her experience as a Mexican woman to comment on the female body." (Just a completely made-up example but I hope you get the picture.) Some of the content I removed from the draft could conceivably be readded if a reliable source has said it, and you attribute the opinion to them. Also, it's not usually appropriate to have detailed commentary on a specific work in an artist bio. (I suppose there could be some exception where the work has attracted a large degree of attention.) But generally speaking I would expect more of a broad career survey plus potentially some overall notes about themes and techniques that run through an artist's works. But anyways, thanks for your contributions so far, and I hope you stick around to improve this articles and other articles here! Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:26, 20 August 2020 (UTC)