User talk:Mazzarin3

Overlinking
I've reverted most of your edits to ISO/IEC 8652 because, although they were clearly done in good faith, they weren't necessarily helpful. The most obvious problem was many redlinks, some of which were redundant (eg ISO/IEC 8652:2012, in the ISO/IEC 8652 article), wrong but easily fixable (eg ISO/IEC JTC1/SC 22/WG 9 --> ISO/IEC JTC1/SC22), or just plain WP:OVERLINKING.

I see from your contributions that you've added links to other articles - apparently those tagged with Underlinked. While we do want more links in those articles, just wrapping square brackets around significant terms isn't always the best way of doing this. A good hint that there's a problem is if you preview the new version and find that all of the new links are red. Red links aren't automatically bad, but adding lots of them is an indicator of the wrong approach. I strongly recommend that you have a read through WP:MOSLINK before adding more links.

Not all of your edits were problematic, eg these are fine.

Mitch Ames (talk) 04:13, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Mitch, I agree with your comments. I will take them onboard.

(Gerhard 22:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC))

Marwan Charbel
Hello, I'm Egeymi. I noticed that you recently removed some content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Egeymi (talk) 21:10, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi Egeymi, thanks for the comment. I removed the content, which was my own, temporarily as I was interrupted and could not complete the edit. It has now been fully reinstated with references. I will take onboard your valid comment to give a short description explaining my edits. Thanks for the pointer.

(Gerhard 22:50, 5 May 2013 (UTC))